Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Manoj Pathak And Anr vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4509 of 2018 Petitioner :- Manoj Pathak And Anr. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Sanjay Kumar Srivastav
Hon'ble Govind Mathur,J. Hon'ble Rajiv Lochan Mehrotra,J.
Heard Sri Satendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sanjay Kumar Srivastav, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4, learned A.G.A. for the respondents-State and perused the record.
This petition for writ under Article 226 of Constitution of India is preferred with a prayer to quash the first information report bearing Case Crime No. 39 of 2018 pending investigation at Police Station Tundla, District Firozabad pertaining to offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 307, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3(1)(D), (Dh) SC/ST Act 1989.
While filing the petition for writ, the petitioner has not disclosed that he has moved an application to surrender the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Firozabad and the matter is fixed before that court today only. In view of this factual background, we do not find any just reason to interfere in the matter.
The writ petition is dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 22.2.2018 BKM/-
.
(Rajiv Lochan Mehrotra,J.) (Govind Mathur,J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Manoj Pathak And Anr vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 February, 2018
Judges
  • Govind Mathur
Advocates
  • Satendra Singh