Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Manjula vs Rudresh R And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|13 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2017 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6002/2016 (MV) BETWEEN :
SMT. MANJULA,W/O LATE RANGANATH AGED 49 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURIST R/O BIRURU, NOW RESIDING AT C/O N.H.KRISHNAPPA S/O HANUMANTHAPPA ANJANEYA STREET NAVILE, SHIVAMOGGA – 577 201 ...APPELLANT (BY SRI PRASAD B.S, ADVOCATE) AND :
1. RUDRESH.R, S/O RAMA BOVI AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURIST R/O DURGAMMA STREET BOVI COLONY, BIRUR – 577 116 KADUR TALUK 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. PANDURANGA COMPLEX, K.T. STREET CHICKMAGALUR – 577 101 ...RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 28.06.2016 PASSED IN MVC NO.449/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE 2ND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ADDITIONAL MACT-2, SHIVAMOGGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, H.G.RAMESH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):
On 30.05.2017, two weeks’ time was granted for compliance of office objections raised on the appeal failing which it was ordered that the appeal would stand dismissed. As the office objections were not complied within the time granted, the appeal stood dismissed on expiry of the time granted. Hence, no further order is necessary.
Appeal dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE LB
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Manjula vs Rudresh R And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
13 July, 2019
Judges
  • H G Ramesh
  • K S Mudagal Miscellaneous