(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The present application is filed by the convict through his son, seeking temporary bail for a period of 30 days so as to arrange for further studies of his daughter, who has passed Standard-XII examination (in March 2007).
2. RULE.
Mr., learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.
3. The applicant- appellant- original accused has been convicted for the offences punishable under sections 324, 345, 363, 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code to undergo imprisonment for life, with fine of Rs.15,000/- in default to further undergo imprisonment for 5 months as awarded vide judgement dated 22nd May 2009 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.12, Ahmedabad in Sessions Case No.88 of 2008.
4. The learned APP has invited attention of the Court to the Jail remarks. The convict has undergone 4 years, 11 months and 15 days in Jail as on 13th June 2012. The convict had enjoyed furlough twice in the years 2010 and 2011 and has reported in time.
5. The learned advocate for the applicant and convict states that the applicant will produce documents in support of the fact that the convict's daughter is admitted for further studies in an institution.
6. For the contents of the application, the same is allowed. The convict is ordered to be released on temporary bail for a period of 30 (thirty) days from the date of his release on his executing a personal bond of Rs.5000/- (Rupees five thousand only) to the satisfaction of the Jail authorities.
7. The convict shall surrender himself to the Jail authorities on expiry of the above temporary bail period. The application is allowed. Rule is made absolute. Direct service is permitted.
(RAVI R. TRIPATHI, J.) (PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) karim Top