Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Mamta And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|17 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 17313 of 2021 Applicant :- Mamta And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Mohit Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Keshari Nath Tripathi
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Counter affidavit filed on behalf of opposite party, is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the record.
It is contended on behalf of the applicants that they are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. There is no independent witness of the alleged incident. There is no evidence on record regarding conspiracy except for the confessional statement of co-accused. Medical evidence on record does not support the case of prosecution. The applicants are ladies have no criminal antecedent.
Learned A.G.A. learned counsel for the opposite party opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, considering the nature of accusation and the fact that they have no criminal antecedent, the applicants are entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in this case.
In the event of arrest of the applicants Mamta and Lalita involved in Case Crime No. 05 of 2021, under Sections 376, 120B IPC and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, Police Station Hazratnagar Garhi, District Sambhal, shall be released on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report, if any, under section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. before the competent Court on thier furnishing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) the applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii) the applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police office;
(iii) the applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passport the same shall be deposited by them before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.
In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicants.
The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order independently without being prejudice by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicants.
The applicants are directed to produce a certified copy of this order, before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.
Order Date :- 17.12.2021 Arti
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mamta And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
17 December, 2021
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • Mohit Singh