Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Malika vs State Of Tamilnadu And Others

Madras High Court|09 March, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 09.03.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH H.C.P No.1797 of 2016 Malika .. Petitioner Vs
1. State of TamilNadu, Rep.By The Scretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600009.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Commissioner office Vepery, Chennai – 600 007. .. Respondents Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus or any other Writ of direction calling for the records relating to the detention order in Memo No.836/BCDFGISSSV/2016, dated 05.08.2016 passed by the 2nd respondent under the Tamilnadu Act 14 of 1982 and set aside the same and direct the respondent to Produce the petitioner's son THIRU.RAJAN S/O. RAJENDRAN aged about 27 years the detenue, now confined in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai before this Hon'ble court and set the petitioner's son THIRU. RAJAN S/O. RAJENDRAN aged about 27 years the detenue herein at liberty.
For Petitioner : Mr.R. Muthukumar For respondents : Mr.V.M.R. Rajendran Addl. Public Prosecutor JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S. NAGAMUTHU,J.,) The petitioner, who is the mother of the detenu Rajan, S/o. Rajendran, aged 27 years has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the second respondent dated 05.08.2016 against her son branding him as a "Goonda" under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 [Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982].
2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the order of detention passed by the second respondent as against the son of the petitioner dated 05.08.2016 has been revoked by the Government in G.O. [Rt] No.4623 Home, Prohibition & Excise [XIII] Department dated 28.09.2016 and he has also produced a copy of the said order.
3. Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this petition is closed as the same has become infructuous.
Index : Yes/no Internet : Yes/no kv/cse (S.N.J.,) (A.S.M.J.,) 09-03-2017 To
1. State of TamilNadu, Rep.By The Scretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600009.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Commissioner office Vepery, Chennai – 600 007.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai.
S.NAGAMUTHU,J.
And
ANITA SUMANTH,J.,
kv/cse Judgment in H.C.P.No.1797 of 2016 09-03-2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Malika vs State Of Tamilnadu And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
09 March, 2017
Judges
  • S Nagamuthu
  • Anita Sumanth