Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mahi And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 66
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 2849 of 2018 Petitioner :- Mahi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Pratap Singh,Jay Shree Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Md. Muzzammil.I.Qureshi,Mohd Shaban Ahmad
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
Learned counsel for respondent no.4 states that counter affidavit has been served on earlier counsel for the petitioners.
Sri Raj Kumar Sharma, Advocate states that he has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioners but his name has not been printed in the cause list.
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is granted a week's time to file rejoinder affidavit.
It is stated by learned counsel for the parties that they have talked with their clients who have told them that there is every possibility of petitioner no.2 settling all the differences with her husband, respondent no.4. In this behalf, a joint affidavit may be filed on the next date in case both the parties have decided to lead happy marital life.
List this case on 7.05.2019, showing the name of Sri Raj Kumar Sharma as counsel for the petitioners. On that date, respondent no.4 shall remain present before this Court along with the corpus, Mahi, petitioner no.1.
Order Date :- 25.4.2019 MN/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mahi And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 April, 2019
Judges
  • Rajul Bhargava
Advocates
  • Suresh Pratap Singh Jay Shree Tripathi