Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mahanand Sharma vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19351 of 2019 Petitioner :- Mahanand Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar,Vijit Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashish Agrawal Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard Sri Vijit Saxena, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ashish Agrawal, learned Counsel for the respondents.
The instant writ petition has been filed against the legal notice dated 30.03.2019 issued by the Counsel for the respondent no.2.
The writ petition against legal notice is not maintainable as no cause of action arises.
This writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs.
Order Date :- 30.5.2019 S.P.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mahanand Sharma vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 May, 2019
Judges
  • Bharati Sapru
Advocates
  • Sunil Kumar Vijit Saxena

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.