A.Settu vs V.Anitha
Judges:
04 September, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the fair and decretal order dated 27.06.2011 made in I.A.No.158 of 2010 in O.S.No.70 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Sub-Court, Tiruvannamalai.2. The petitioner is first defendant and respondent is plaintiff in O.S.No.70 of 2007 on the file of...
Madras High Court
M Prema vs The Agricultural Production Commissioner And Principal Secretary To Government And Others
Judges: V Parthiban
04 September, 2017·Heard Mrs.S.T.P.Kuilmozhi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.T.M.Pappiah, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.2. The petitioner has approached this Court for seeking the following relief, “To issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for th...
Madras High Court
Iyyappan ... 1St vs The Deputy Superintendent Of ...
Judges:
04 September, 2017·In view of the amendments made in the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, this Court is of the view that the usual directions that were issued by this Court cannot be issued routinely in all cases. Therefore, the petitioners are directed to surrender before...
Madras High Court
M.Palanivel vs The Management
Judges:
04 September, 2017·By consent of both sides, this writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the 1st respondent and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the 2nd respondent.3.This Writ Petition is directed against the impugned order ...
Madras High Court
S.Venkatesan vs V.Sudha
Judges:
04 September, 2017·and P.VELMURUGAN, J.C.M.A.Nos.486 of 2016 and 1159 of 2017 04.09.2017...
Madras High Court
N.Dravidamani vs K.M.Subramanian
Judges:
04 September, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decretal order dated 16.04.2008 made in I.A.No.534 of 2005 in O.S.No.136 of 2005 on the file of the Additional District Munisif Court, Ariyalur.2. The petitioners are the third parties, the 1st respondent is the plaintiff and respondents 2 t...
Madras High Court
R.G.Sadagopan .. Petitioner vs .
Judges:
04 September, 2017·This petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent to register a case based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner dated 11.04.2017 and investigate the same.2. Petitioner's complaint dated 11.4.2017 is reported to have been closed on the ground that the parties have entered into comprom...
Madras High Court
M.Bandayee Ammal vs State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
04 September, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.] The petitioner is the mother of the detenu, namely, Ayyavu, Son of Marutha Servai, aged about 43 years. The detenu has been detained by the second respondent by his order in Detention Order No.17/2017, dated 16.03.2017, holding him to be a "Goonda", ...
Madras High Court
R.Kumaravel vs The Govt. Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
04 September, 2017·The relief sought for in this writ petition is for a declaration to declare that the petitioner is deemed to have regularized in service with effect from 09.05.2002 onwards i.e. on completion of 1= years of service in terms of G.O.Ms.No.71, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department dated 05...
Madras High Court
S.Nagalakshmi vs 4 The Tahsildar
Judges:
04 September, 2017·Mr.S.V.Doraisolaimalai, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4th respond...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.