T S Meenakshi vs A Sreenivasa Gopalan
Judges: M Duraiswamy
09 November, 2017·Challenging the fair and final order passed in I.A.No.3214 of 2012 in O.P.No.2921 of 2012 on the file of the III Additional Judge, Family Court, Chennai, the respondent has filed the above appeal.2. The respondent, husband, filed the Original Petition in O.P.No.2921 of 2012 for divorce on the ground...
Madras High Court
N Yazhini vs Pondicherry University Represented By Its Vice Chancellor R V Nagar And Others
Judges: N Kirubakaran
09 November, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09-11-2017 CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN W.P.No.6701 of 2017 N.Yazhini ... Petitioner Vs1. Pondicherry University represented By its Vice - Chancellor R.V.Nagar, Kalapet Puducherry.2. The Dean, Indira Gandhi M...
Madras High Court
St Anne'S Aided Primary School vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu And Others
Judges: N Kirubakaran
09 November, 2017·The petitioner school is a Christian Minority school having student strength of 1343 for the academic year 2015-2016 with 21 teachers working in sanctioned posts including the Headmistress. The teacher-student ratio has been complied with as per the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Educatio...
Madras High Court
K.Sivasubramaniam Spinners ... vs Deputy Commissioner Of Labour/
Judges:
09 November, 2017·This writ petition has been filed challenging the correctness of the impugned order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour/Appellate Authority, Coimbatore District directing the petitioner to pay the subsistence allowance from 4.8.2013 to 31.12.2014 to the third respondent.2. Learned counsel fo...
Madras High Court
M/S Aarkaya Consultants vs N/S Nittsu Logistics ( India ) Private Limited Rep By Its General Manager And Others
Judges: Anita Sumanth
09 November, 2017·This petition is filed seeking an order of termination of mandate of the second respondent and the appointment of a new Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes inter se the parties.2. The parties entered into a service agreement dated 01.07.2016 that provides for a mechanism of settlement of disput...
Madras High Court
S J Pappaiyan vs The District Collector Thiruvallur District And Others
Judges: V Parthiban
09 November, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn....
Madras High Court
Thirunindra Narayana Finance Ltd Rep By Its Director vs Jayapandian And Others
Judges: V Bharathidasan
09 November, 2017·THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Crl.A.No.880 of 2004 Thirunindra Narayana Finance Ltd Rep. by its Director, A.K.Prabakar, No.64, 4th Avenue, Ashok Nagar, Chennai. ... Appellant vs.1. Jayapandian2. Esther ... Respondents Criminal Appeal preferred u...
Madras High Court
Dr N Dayalan vs The Tamil Nadu Government Represented By Its Secretary Housing And Urban Development Department Government Of Tamil Nadu Fort St George And Others
Judges: V Parthiban
09 November, 2017·When the matter was called on 01.11.2017, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court has posted the matter under the caption “For dismissal” on 09.11.2017. But, even today when the matter was called, there is no representation for the petitioner.2. Hence,...
Madras High Court
A.Poosamalai vs State Rep. By The
Judges:
09 November, 2017·[Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH, J.] This appeal has been filed by the appellant / sole accused as against the conviction and sentence, dated 29.03.2016, made in S.C.No.18 of 2014 by the learned Sessions cum Mahila Court Judge, Madurai.2.The appellant stood convicted and sentenced to un...
Madras High Court
V P Murugesan vs The District Collector
Judges: V Parthiban
09 November, 2017·When the writ petition was called on 03.11.2017, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court has posted the matter under the caption “For dismissal” on 09.11.2017. But, even today when the writ petition was called, there was no representation for the petitioner. 2....
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.