Veerakumaran vs Parkavi
Judges:
08 March, 2017·The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, t...
Madras High Court
K.Alagumalai vs State Through
Judges:
08 March, 2017·The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, t...
Madras High Court
Minor Ayush Baheti vs Kasi
Judges:
08 March, 2017·C.M.A.No.3239 of 2012 is filed against the award, dated 05.07.2012, passed in M.C.O.P.No.971 of 2008, on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Additional District Court, Krishnagiri.C.M.A.No.3358 of 2012 is filed against the award, dated 05.07.2012, passed in M.C.O.P.No.972 of 2008, on the fil...
Madras High Court
Veeranan vs The District Collector
Judges:
08 March, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the first respondent to forbear the second respondent from demolishing the house of the petitioner situates in Survey No.86/8 at Athikaripatty Village, Per...
Madras High Court
Sugan vs The State Represented By
Judges:
08 March, 2017·When this Court was about to dismiss this petition on merits, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Permission is granted. This Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.To1.The...
Madras High Court
Gopal vs The Commander Works Engineer
Judges:
08 March, 2017·Learned Counsel for the petitioners sought to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. Accordingly, recording his statement and the endorsement, the Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos. 37053, 37054, 34206, 34207, 34208 and 34209 o...
Madras High Court
C.Boopathi vs 6 The Tahsildar
Judges:
08 March, 2017·The petitioner sought for service connection to his Well. He has complied with all the requirements. However, the request of the petitioner was rejected by the impugned order dated 16.04.2016 by the fourth respondent on the premise that the original suit in O.S.No.252 of 2015 has been filed by the p...
Madras High Court
Fmc India Pvt Ltd vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct)
Judges:
08 March, 2017·Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondent. By consent, the main writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.2.This writ petition is filed seeking for a mandamus directing the respondent to consider the Rectification Application dated 2...
Madras High Court
K.G.Venkatesh Reddy vs M/S.Kns System Pvt. Ltd
Judges:
08 March, 2017·Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect. Recording the said endorsement, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 08.03.2017 Index:yes/no Inter...
Madras High Court
R.Chitra vs The Nadu Public Service ...
Judges:
08 March, 2017·Though the writ petition is for issuance of a writ of mandamus for giving positive directions to the first respondent, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would be suffice, if this Court give a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation which was...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.