K.Maria Devid vs The Superintendent Of Police
Judges:
09 March, 2017·Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs...
Madras High Court
M.S.Arora vs 3 The Commissioner
Judges:
09 March, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by the Acting Chief Justice) Mr.M.K.Subramanian, learned Government Pleader takes notice for the first respondent. Mr.K.Rajasrinivas, learned counsel takes notice for the second respondent and Mr.V.C.Selvasekaran, learned counsel takes notice for the third respondent.2. ...
Madras High Court
M.Pagudhi Naidu vs T.S.Natarajan
Judges:
09 March, 2017·It is reported that sole appellant died even on 12.11.2006 itself. However, so far, no steps has been taken. Therefore the appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.To1.The II Additional District Judge, Tiruchirapalli.2.The III Additional District Munsiff, Tiruchirapalli.3.The Section Office, V.R.Sect...
Madras High Court
A.Abdul Gafoor vs K.Kandasamy
Judges:
09 March, 2017·The suit has been laid by the plaintiff for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 23.01.2012 by directing the defendants to execute the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff, after receiving the balance sale consideration of Rs.10,62,747/-, failing which, convey legal possession of the sui...
Madras High Court
S.M.Waris Mohideen vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
09 March, 2017·The Petitioner has approached this Court seeking quash of the proceedings of the 3rd respondent dated 30.03.2010, said to have been pronounced by the 2nd respondent in the absence of any meeting, under Section 17 of the Wakf Act, 1995 on 10.06.2010 in Item No.3/09 in Na.Ka.No.7636/08/Aa15/Thegal, an...
Madras High Court
M/S.Ananda Steel Industries vs The Commissioner
Judges:
09 March, 2017·1. The petitioner is aggrieved against the demand notice dated 01.02.2017, wherein and whereby the petitioner was called upon to pay the property tax to the tune of Rs.87,152/-.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent Municipality.3. What is under challenge in this writ pet...
Madras High Court
L.Praveen Kumar vs K.Shahul Hameed
Judges:
09 March, 2017·The suit has been laid by the plaintiff for recovery of money on the basis of the promissory note but the defendant has not contested the case of the plaintiff and accordingly set ex-parte.2.In support of the plaintiff's case, the plaintiff examined himself as PW1 and the documents Exs.P1 to P4 were...
Madras High Court
Mr.Siddarth Gautham Selvaraj vs The Secretary
Judges:
09 March, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this and has circulated a Letter dated 28.02.2017 to the Registry to that effect. He has also made an endorsement in the writ petition. 2 In view of the submission of the letter dated 28.02.2017 to the Regist...
Madras High Court
R.Chinna Sundaraiya vs The Inspector Of Police
Judges:
09 March, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondent to give necessary permission for conducting Adalpadal programme in the place mentioned therein, by way of issuing a writ of mandamus.2.Mr.T....
Madras High Court
Sumithra vs Bijoy Kr Saha
Judges:
09 March, 2017·(Made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.) Not satisfied with the quantum of compensation of Rs.17,23,000/- with interest, at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of claim till deposit and costs, awarded in M.C.O.P.No.3480/2012 dated 25.03.2014 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (III Judge, Court ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.