Muthusamy vs Mariammal
Judges:
01 June, 2017·The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that despite he contacted with parties, the parties are not coming forward to instruct.2. Hence, the second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.To1. The Principal District Munsif, Tirunelveli.2. The Principal Subordinate Judge, Tenkasi.3. The Rec...
Madras High Court
M.Baskar vs Sundaravalli
Judges:
01 June, 2017·(ORDER OF THE COURT WAS MADE BY S.MANIKUMAR, J.) On 24th April 2017, we passed the following order:"Contempt Petition No.1393 of 2016 has been directed to be listed before this Bench.2. Petitioners have filed W.P.No.12873/2015, for a mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5, to remove the encroach...
Madras High Court
C.Senguttuvan vs The Managing Director
Judges:
01 June, 2017·The petitioners in W.P.Nos.1001 to 1003 & 1005 to 1007, having retired from service as Selection Grade Senior Conductor/Selection Grade Assistant/Selection Grade Driver/Foreman in the respondent Corporation on 30.4.2016, 31.5.2012, 31.7.2011, 31.5.2014, 31.10.2016, 31.5.2016 respectively, have filed...
Madras High Court
M/S. Vtx Industries Ltd vs Central Provident Fund ...
Judges:
01 June, 2017·Challenging the show cause notice of the third respondent dated 08.05.2015 and for a consequential direction to adjust the excess amount remitted by the petitioner in a sum of Rs.88,34,946/- towards the P.F. dues payable by the petitioner for the corresponding period, the present writ petition has b...
Madras High Court
M/S.Senthamizh Construction & ... vs Commissioner
Judges:
01 June, 2017·W.P.No.2276/2017 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of declaration declaring that the entire Tender process in pursuant to Tender Notice No.05/ 2016- 2017/ SDO/ Dated 05.12.2016 on the file of the 2nd respondent in respect of item no.1 as null and void on the afores...
Madras High Court
Tmt.Leika vs The Director General Of Prisons
Judges:
01 June, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by NOOTY.RAMAMOHANA RAO,J) This writ petition has been instituted seeking a direction not to transfer the alleged detenu from Central Prison, Puzhal II to any other far off prison.NOOTY.RAMAMOHANA RAO,J AND S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J RS2. Mr.V.M.R.Rajendran, learned Additional Pu...
Madras High Court
S.Natarajan vs Sri Arunachaleswarar ...
Judges:
01 June, 2017·The judgment debtor in E.P.No.132 of 2003, on the file of the Registrar, Small Causes Court, Chennai and the petitioner in M.P.No.71 of 2005 is the civil revision petitioner before this Court, challenging the order made in M.P.No.71 of 2005 in E.P.No.132 of 2003, to ejecting the suit in Eject Suit N...
Madras High Court
The Deputy Chief Engineer vs Kandasamy
Judges:
01 June, 2017·2.The Special Tahsildar (LA), Salem Karur New Broad Gauge, Railway Line Scheme, Karur. ... Referring Officer/ Respondent PRAYER: Appeal Suit is filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, against the judgment and decree, dated 19.12.2011, passed in L.A.O.P.No.84 of 2011, by the learned Addit...
Madras High Court
M/S.International Sree Balaji vs The Authorised Officer
Judges:
01 June, 2017·(Order of the court was made by HULUVADI G.RAMESH,J.) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of the court to withdraw the writ petition and has made an endorsement to that effect. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. The connected miscellaneous p...
Madras High Court
S.Vinoth vs S.Thirumoorthy
Judges:
01 June, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking direction of this Court to the Principal Sub Court, Karur to dispose of the I.P.No.35 of 2013, within a specific time frame.2.The revision petitioners are the respondents 2 and 3 in the insolvency pro...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.