A.Pandian vs Thenmozhi
Judges:
02 June, 2017·The Revision Petitioner is the third defendant in the suit filed for partition. A preliminary decree was passed on 09.11.1993, ascertaining the share of the plaintiff and other sharers. Pursuant to the preliminary decree, a final decree application was filed wherein, the Trial Court after considerin...
Madras High Court
Arulmigu Mangalanathan ... vs P.Thangavelu ... 1St
Judges:
02 June, 2017·(Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J.) This appeal is directed against the order passed in W.P(MD)No.446 of 2017, dated 15.03.2017.2. The appellant herein is the fifth respondent, which is a temple. The first respondent/writ petitioner filed the said writ petition for issuance of...
Madras High Court
Sathish Seelan vs The Superintendent Of Police
Judges:
02 June, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to give necessary permission for conducting Adalpadal programme in the place mentioned therein, by way of issuing a Writ of Mandamus.2.Mr.T...
Madras High Court
S.Banumathi vs S.Gunasekar
Judges:
02 June, 2017·The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff, praying for declaration, to declare that the suit schedule property belongs to the plaintiff and for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants and their men, agents or any persons claiming under them, from interfering with the plaintiff's peace...
Madras High Court
The Secretary vs The Director Of Collegiate ...
Judges:
02 June, 2017·This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceeding issued by second respondent Joint Director, dated 21.02.2017, quash the same and further direct the second respondent / Joint Director of...
Madras High Court
M/S South India Corporation ... vs M/S Dcw Limited
Judges:
02 June, 2017·NOOTY.RAMAMOHANA RAO,J.The appellant, South India Corporation Limited, and the respondents have amicably settled the outstanding dispute amongst them. The terms of compromise have also been reduced to writing and the Joint Memo of Compromise signed by the parties has also been filed into the Court t...
Madras High Court
Marimuthu vs S.Ragavan
Judges:
02 June, 2017·Alleging that the order dated 05.10.2015 passed by this Court in W.P.No.1709 of 2014 has not been complied with, the present contempt petition has been filed. M.M.SUNDRESH, J.mmi2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Special Government Pleader submitted that the order of this Court has ...
Madras High Court
A.Vanajamuniyan vs A.G.S.Ravi @ Rajagopal
Judges:
02 June, 2017·This criminal appeal is filed against the Judgment of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Cuddalore in S.C.No.391 of 2008. 1/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl A.No.139 of 20182. The appellant filed a private complaint before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Parangipettai under <act id=4LGxPo...
Madras High Court
K.Rajeswari vs The Special Deputy ...
Judges:
02 June, 2017·The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to return her sale deed dated 24.02.2017, by affixing seal under Section 47-A of the Stamp Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act), to enable her to use the same for her day-to-day use.2.The lea...
Madras High Court
Balakrishnan vs B.Veni : 1St
Judges:
02 June, 2017·This appeal has been filed by defendants 2 to 9 in the suit in O.S.No.11 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District Court (Fast Track Court-II), Tirunelveli. The first respondent in this appeal, as plaintiff, filed a suit in O.S.No.11 of 2010 for specific performance of an agreement of sale and ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.