S Kannan Proprietor vs M/S A T Khorakiwala & Co No 21
Judges: M V Muralidaran
08 June, 2017·M.V.MURALIDARAN, J.ub The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as with...
Madras High Court
Mathias vs Regina Mary
Judges:
08 June, 2017·(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.Subbiah, J.) Learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellants, this appeal is dismissed a...
Madras High Court
V.Vani Ayyaswariya vs S.Arunkumar
Judges:
08 June, 2017·This petition is filed to withdraw the proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.895 of 2015 filed before the Principal Family Court, Coimbatore and to transfer the same to Family Court, Erode.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.3. The learn...
Madras High Court
Atul Agarwal vs The Superintendent Of Police
Judges:
08 June, 2017·The learned counsel for the sought permission of this Court to withdraw this revision case and has also made an endorsement to that effect. N.SATHISH KUMAR, J vrc2. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement made, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed ...
Madras High Court
S.Alagu Perumal vs The Superintendent Of Police
Judges:
08 June, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to give necessary permission for conducting Adalpadal programme in the place mentioned therein, by way of issuing a Writ of Mandamus.2.Mr.T...
Madras High Court
K.Ganapathy vs The Founder & Managing Director
Judges:
08 June, 2017·On 05.06.2017, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted on 07.06.2017 under the caption "for Dismissal".2. Even today (08.06.2017), when the matter is listed, there is no representation on behalf of the peti...
Madras High Court
V.Vajravadivel vs 2 The Tahsildar
Judges:
08 June, 2017·The petitioners have filed the above writ petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider their representation dated 03.03.2017 and issue joint patta in their favour for their land measuring an extent of 1908 Sq.ft. comprised in Survey No.265/17 situated at Nadhu Stree...
Madras High Court
M/S Alagu G.G.Granites vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
08 June, 2017·The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's application dated 01.03.2016 seeking lease of the quarry by taking note of their further representation dated 27.02.2017 in respect of their patta lands measuring 4.16.0 hectares compri...
Madras High Court
Dr.Vivek Mady vs Dr.Akhila Bhat
Judges:
08 June, 2017·(svki) C.R.P.(P.D.) Nos.1831 and 2049 of 2012 08.06.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
K.Jayaprakash vs The Chennai Metropolitan Water ...
Judges:
07 June, 2017·(R3 to R8 impleaded vide order dated 10.05.2017 in W.M.P.Nos.13252 to 13257 of 2017 in W.P.No.9754 of 2017) W.P.No.9754 of 2017: Writ petition filed under <act id=zbGxPokB_szha0nWKNIH section=226>Article 226 </act>of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of declaration declaring that the tender...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.