P. Chandrabose vs 2 The Joint Registrar/Managing ...
Judges:
08 June, 2017·This writ petition has been preferred seeking a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to conclude the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner within a stipulated time as fixed by the first respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.3384/2015/Sa.Pa. dated 29.01.2016.T.RAJA...
Madras High Court
A. Antony Margret vs 4 The Corresondent
Judges:
08 June, 2017·This writ petition has been preferred calling in question, the legality and validity of the transfer order dated 29.07.2015 passed by the Superintendent of Schools, R.C.Schools, Diocese of Coimbatore, the third respondent herein and also the consequential relieving order dated 31.07.2015 passed by t...
Madras High Court
K.N. Balaji Chandrasekar vs 4 K.Thiyagarajan
Judges:
08 June, 2017·The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent 1 & 2 from making any entries in S.No.52 A ( 553 /24 Part), G.L.R.S.No.552/186, measuring an extent 12.38 cents of Wellington Cantonment Board, Wellington, The Nilgiris from including the name of ...
Madras High Court
Aishwarya College Of Engineering ... vs The Member Secretary
Judges:
08 June, 2017·Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer in the Writ Petition has become infructuous and sought permission of this Court to withdraw the same. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Pe...
Madras High Court
R.Sekar vs Mr.Titus
Judges:
08 June, 2017·The order passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner for Labour, Chennai was challenged by the respondent in the writ petition in W.P.No.2580 of 2014.K.K.SASIDHARAN.J., (svki)2. In view of the said subsequent events, this contempt petition is closed, giving liberty to the petitioner to initiate appro...
Madras High Court
Bright vs The Superintendent Of Police
Judges:
08 June, 2017·When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that on the complaint given by Jebamani, the third respondent herein and on the complaint given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry is conducted in C.S.R.No.260 of 2017 and the same were closed on 2...
Madras High Court
D.Bhuvaneshwari vs The Deputy Director Of Health ...
Judges:
08 June, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has circulated a letter dated 07.06.2017, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ petition. Accordingly, the matter appeared today under the caption ?for withdrawal? and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2.In view of the same...
Madras High Court
Vanitha vs Iyyappan
Judges:
08 June, 2017·The wife, who is the respondent in O.P.No.4215 of 2016 before the Family Court, Chennai, is the petitioner. She seeks transfer of the said proceedings to the file of the Sub Court, Theni.2. According to her, she has instituted H.M.O.P.No.6 of 2017 seeking restitution of conjugal rights on the file o...
Madras High Court
Dharmu Ammal vs Mr.C.Suresh Kannan
Judges:
08 June, 2017·It is represented by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent that the order passed in W.P(MD)No.16075 of 2016, dated 29.08.2016 has been complied with. He has also produced a copy of the proceeding dated 25.03.2017 passed by the contemnor/2nd respondent.2.Recording the...
Madras High Court
Kumaran [ vs State
Judges: R Mahadevan
08 June, 2017·When this Criminal Original Petition was taken up, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that Crime No.266 of 2007 came to be closed by the respondent police and the referred charge sheet has also been served on the petitioner.R.MAHADEVAN, J.KM 2.Recording t...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.