A.Ganesan vs The Dindugul Corporation
Judges:
08 June, 2017·This Writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, directing the respondent to appoint the petitioner as sweeper on compassionate ground with the respondent corporation or any other suitable post within the time period stipulated by this Court.2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitio...
Madras High Court
P.Saranya vs The Managing Director
Judges:
08 June, 2017·The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.2.In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.To1.The Managing Director, Administrative Office, City Union Bank Limited,...
Madras High Court
Jeyakanth vs The Superintendent Of Police
Judges:
08 June, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to give necessary permission for conducting Kabadi Sports Competition in the place mentioned therein, by way of issuing a Writ of Mandamus....
Madras High Court
Thangaraj vs Krishnaparamathma
Judges:
08 June, 2017·Lakshmanan .. Respondent / Defendant in SA.No.354/2017 Prayer:- Second Appeals filed under section 100 CPC against the Judgment and decree dated 05.02.2008 in AS.Nos.133/2006 and 179/2007 on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge at Salem, confirming the Judgment and decree dated 19.08....
Madras High Court
S.Malini vs B.Sasidharan
Judges:
08 June, 2017·The unsuccessful defendants are the appellants before this Court. According to the appellants, the appellants were the tenants under one A.Kaliappan and that A.Kaliappan agreed to sell the land to the appellants verbally and that he has taken a sum of Rs.75,000/-, after giving a promissory note. It ...
Madras High Court
M.Pushparaj vs The Director Of Horticulture And ...
Judges:
08 June, 2017·The petitioner was slapped with a charge memo dated 3.2.2004 under Rule 17(b) of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline & Appeal) Rules alleging misappropriation of Rs.2,53,350/-, for which the petitioner submitted his explanation on 28.12.2004. Thereafter, finding that his explanation was not sa...
Madras High Court
R Anandan vs The Govt Of Tamil Nadu And Others
Judges: D Krishnakumar
08 June, 2017·The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider and pass order in Revision Petition on 11.08.2016 against the order dated 03.06.2016 in Na.Ka.No.47900/2015/Sa.Pa.3 on the file of the second Respondent based on the representation ...
Madras High Court
Maharaja Sathyam Industries ... vs State Bank Of India
Judges:
08 June, 2017·The Karur Vysya Bank Limited Represented by its Authorized Officer, Chief Manager, Erode Main, No.24, Muthurangam Street, Erode 638 001. .. Respondent in W.P.Nos.13002 to 13004 of 2017 Prayer in W.P.No.12958/2017:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, to issue a writ of certi...
Madras High Court
Otchubalu vs The State Rep. By
Judges:
08 June, 2017·The petitioner is facing trial in Special S.C. No.3 of 2014, before the III Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Madurai District, Madurai, for offences under Sections 406, 420 and 506(i) I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(X) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 . It is the contention of the petitioner that he be...
Madras High Court
G.Ahmed Anwer vs The State Of Tamilnadu
Judges:
08 June, 2017·This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned order passed by the third respondent in No.T10/2017 dated 10.05.2017 and to quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents herein from, in any manner, demanding or collecting fees from the petitioner herein for the II year MDS cours...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.