Arokiya Marie Lemoan Appellant/Defendant vs Franclin Marie Louis(Died ) And Others
Judges: G Jayachandran
02 January, 2017·This Second Appeal with chequered history is a classic case to understand how the Courts below in their zealous to dispose of the case, are carried away by the compromise memos filed by the counsel, pass judgment without adhering to mandate of Order 23, Rule 3 of Civil Procedure Code and thereafter...
Madras High Court
The Town Club Rep By Its President K P S Mani vs The District Collector And Others
Judges: S Manikumar, M Govindaraj
02 January, 2017·THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ The Town Club rep. by its President W.A.No.1992 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 K.P.S.Mani .. Appellant versus1. The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai District, Tiruvannamalai - 606 604.2. The Tahs...
Madras High Court
Amit Kumar Agarwal vs The District Revenue Officer And Others
Judges: D Krishnakumar
02 January, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.01.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMARW.P.No.19854 of 2013 andM.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2013Amit Kumar Agarwal .. Petitioner ..vs..1. The District Revenue Officer, Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur.2. The Revenue Divisiona...
Madras High Court
S.Murugan vs 3 The Assistant Director Of Animal ...
Judges:
02 January, 2017·By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. The grievance expressed by the petitioner is that despite the order dated 18.2.2015 passed in W.P.No.5206 of 2007 in and by which the writ petition came to be allowed with a further direction to confer all consequential benefits,...
Madras High Court
Thatchanamoorthy vs State Represented By
Judges:
02 January, 2017·This revision arises against the order of learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vanur, Villupuram District, passed in Crl.M.P.No.1082 of 2016 on 24.11.2016, rejecting return of vehicle.2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Advocate [Crl.side].3. Learned Government...
Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs Ahmed Maideen
Judges:
02 January, 2017·In respect of death of one Mohamed Rafiq, aged 23 years, agricultural coolie earning a sum of Rs.6,000/- per month, who died in an accident on 26.09.2011, the claimants, who are the the parents of the deceased, filed a Claim Petition in M.C.O.P.No.44 of 2012 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal...
Madras High Court
Gandhi Silai Kadatkarai Paguthi vs The Govt. Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
02 January, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) The prayer in the petition has become infructuous, in view of G.O. (4D) No.5, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (M.C.I) Department, dated 05.10.2016, constituting the Town Vending Committee and the proceedings of the Commissioner of ...
Madras High Court
M/S Vinplex India Pvt Ltd Rep By Its Director Mr K R Rangarajan No 1 B Gleneden Place Old No 813 New No 310 P H Road Kilpauk Chennai 600 010 vs The Authorised Officer Andhra Bank Anna Nagar Branch Old No 995 Ja/New No 170 2Nd Avenue Annanagar Chennai 600 040 And Others
Judges: S Manikumar, M Govindaraj
02 January, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by S.Manikumar,J) Auction purchaser, M/s. Vinplex India Private Limited, represented by its Director, Mr.K.R.Rajarajan, has sought for a writ of mandamus, directing Andhra Bank, Annanagar branch, to comply with the orders, made in S.A.No.5 of 2013, dated 8/12/2015, on th...
Madras High Court
R.Prabhakaran vs Athulya Misra
Judges:
02 January, 2017·Alleging that the order dated 09.10.2014 passed by this Court in W.P.No.20087 of 2014 has not been complied with in letter and spirit, the present contempt petition has been filed.2.This Court has directed the second respondent in the writ petition to pass appropriate orders on the issue pending con...
Madras High Court
P.Jayaraman vs The Divisional Engineer
Judges:
02 January, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.Writ petition is, thus, dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, M.P.No.1 of 2015 is also dismisse...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.