K.Indirani vs Thiru Govindaraju
Judges:
05 January, 2017·This Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondents for committing contempt of Court by wilfully and wantonly disobeying the order passed by this Court dated 14.06.2016 made in Crl.O.P.No.12036 of 2016.2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.S.Saravanan, Inspector of Police...
Madras High Court
Haja Maitheen vs Maideen Beevi
Judges:
05 January, 2017·The petitioner has addressed a letter to the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court, dated 28.12.2016, stating that he has not given any consent to the Advocate to file the present Civil Revision Petition and prayed for to struck off the Civil Revision Petition.2. Today, when the matter is taken up for ...
Madras High Court
P.Jeewanmal Gothi vs The Public Information Office
Judges:
05 January, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) The impugned order dated 14.10.2016 is an appealable order. But the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Appellate Authority, before whom the appeal has to be preferred, has not been specified.2. The learned Government Pleader...
Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs Minor Abishek
Judges:
05 January, 2017·Appeal filed by the Transport Corporation, challenging the quantum of compensation awarded in M.C.O.P.No.61 of 2012 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Principal District Judge, Perambalur, under which, a sum of Rs.2,03,000/- has been awarded.2. The breakup details of the Award runs as...
Madras High Court
G.Venkatamma vs The Director Of Sericulture
Judges:
05 January, 2017·By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioner is a daily wage employee and admittedly her service came to be regularised. The grievance expressed by the petitioner is that all of a sudden, the Assistant Director of Sericulture, Madhahalli, has issued an impugned memo...
Madras High Court
P.Baggya vs The Director Of Sericulture
Judges:
05 January, 2017·By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioner is a daily wage employee and admittedly her service came to be regularised. The grievance expressed by the petitioner is that all of a sudden, the Assistant Director of Sericulture, Madhahalli, has issued an impugned memo...
Madras High Court
Pannerselvam vs Mohandoss
Judges:
05 January, 2017·The plaintiff and the first defendant are brothers. The suit property is a joint family property belonging to both these parties. They have partitioned the suit property by way of a registered partition deed dated 23-04-1984 as per which the plaintiff was given E Schedule property and the defendan...
Madras High Court
Sanju Samuvel vs The Collector Of Tiruvallur
Judges:
05 January, 2017·The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 05.03.2013.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner purchased the subject property from one Mr. P. Saravanakumar under Docu...
Madras High Court
Rajavel vs Neela
Judges:
05 January, 2017·The appellants are the defendants in the suit filed for recovery of money on a promissory note. The appellants are the sons and daughter of one Chinnappa Naidu, who is stated to have received a sum of Rs.60,000/- on execution of Ex.A1 promissory note. The said Chinnappa Naidu died on 09.02.2002 af...
Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs V.Veerababu
Judges:
05 January, 2017·Challenging the multiplier method adopted by the Claims Tribunal, for quantifying the compensation for loss of earning capacity, the transport Corporation has filed this appeal.2. The Claimant Veerababu, aged 42 years, employed as a cook, earning a sum of Rs.25,000/- per month, met with an accident ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.