D.Radhakrishnan vs The Government Of India
Judges:
05 January, 2017·The prayer in this writ petition is for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the second respondent to pay the arrears of salary, as per 6th Pay Commission, from 01.01.2007 to 03.10.2010, to the petitioner.2. The writ petitioner was initially appointed as a B.T.Assistant, in the third respondent ...
Madras High Court
.. Petitioner vs .
Judges:
05 January, 2017·Today, when the Civil Revision Petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner has sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made in the Civil Revis...
Madras High Court
J.Subbulakshmi vs Ponraj
Judges:
05 January, 2017·Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this civil revision petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the said submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this civil revision petition st...
Madras High Court
Dr.Kent A. Krishnaswamy vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
05 January, 2017·Petitioners have come up with this Writ Petition seeking to forbear the respondents concerned from interfering with their right to practice Community Medical Service by using 31 essential drugs mentioned in the CMS Certificate issued by W.R.M.A. (World Rural Medical Association), New Delhi, in order...
Madras High Court
Dr.S.Jayapradha vs Union Of India
Judges:
05 January, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by S.Manikumar,J) Vide order dated, 2nd January 2017, the matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Madras.2. On this day, both the learned counsel for the parties submitted that subject matter of SARFAESI proceedings is settled.3. Copy of...
Madras High Court
M.Siddamallu vs The Director Of Sericulture
Judges:
05 January, 2017·By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioner is a daily wage employee and admittedly her service came to be regularised. The grievance expressed by the petitioner is that all of a sudden, the Assistant Director of Sericulture, Madhahalli, has issued an impugned memo...
Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs Minor P.Raja
Judges:
05 January, 2017·The appeal filed by the Transport Corporation, challenging the quantum of compensation awarded in M.C.O.P.No.60 of 2012 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Principal District Judge, Perambalur, under which, a sum of Rs.2,01,000/- has been awarded.2. The breakup details of the Award run...
Madras High Court
P.Ayyammal vs The State Through
Judges:
05 January, 2017·This petition has been filed to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent.3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the resp...
Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs Minor Nathiya
Judges:
05 January, 2017·Heard both sides.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the second respondent would submit that the claimant has filed claim petition seeking damages from both the first and second respondent-Transport Corporations, for having sustained injuries in the accident that ha...
Madras High Court
V.Manivannan vs The District Elementary
Judges:
05 January, 2017·By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mr.K.Dhananjayan, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.2 The petitioner would state that he initially joined the service as Secondary Grade Teacher on 11.09.1987 and got his promotions as Selectio...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.