M.Pitchandi vs N.S.Moorthy
Judges:
06 January, 2017·The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Appeal. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.S.BASKARAN,J.cla In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this Criminal Appeal is dismissed as withdra...
Madras High Court
Palraj vs T.Murugasamy
Judges:
06 January, 2017·Inspite of the listing of the matter under the caption either for disposal or for dismissal, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Therefore, this criminal original petition is dismissed for default. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.To1.The Judic...
Madras High Court
R.Sambandan vs The Commissioner Of Municipal ...
Judges:
06 January, 2017·When the matter was taken up for hearing on 03.01.2017, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted on 05.01.2017 under the caption "For Dismissal". Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. Hence,...
Madras High Court
T.Vijaya Selvan : vs The District Collector
Judges:
06 January, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH, J.] Today, when the matter was taken up for consideration, the fifth respondent has filed a memo dated 31.12.2016, which reads thus:"It is submitted that the claim of the 5th respondent is satisfied and discharged. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication a...
Madras High Court
Kangeyan vs The Station House Officer
Judges:
06 January, 2017·Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this revision and has also made an endorsement to that effect.Recording the said endorsement, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 06.01.2017 Index:yes/no Internet...
Madras High Court
Peria Varadaiya Gounder @ vs Nanjappan
Judges:
06 January, 2017·This revision is directed against the order of the learned District Munsif, Sathyamangalam dated 19.03.2012 in I.A.No.314 of 2009 in O.S.No.391 of 2004, dismissing the petition filed under Order 1, Rule 10(2) of CPC. The petitioners herein are the plaintiffs in the suit and the respondents 1 to 3 he...
Madras High Court
M.T.Varghese vs A.Thomas
Judges:
06 January, 2017·The claimant has approached this Court seeking enhancement of compensation awarded to him by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for the injuries that he had suffered when he was knocked down by a lorry while he was travelling as a pillion rider in a two wheeler on 03-10-1997.2. For the injuries suff...
Madras High Court
Puducherry Poorviga Kudimakkal vs The Chief Secretary
Judges:
06 January, 2017·(Order of the Court made by B.RAJENDRAN,J.) The petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition seeking to call for the records relating to the fixing of cut-off date for the origin/Migrant in respect of OBCs in the Union Territory of Puducherry as 19.02.2001 as resolved by Council of Ministers vide ...
Madras High Court
R.Vinod Kumar vs The Commissioner Of Corporation
Judges:
06 January, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) On hearing learned counsel for parties, it is directed that the second respondent should cause an inspection to be made of the area within fifteen days of the receipt of the order and if encroachment on the road as alleged by the petitioner ...
Madras High Court
Kannammal vs Lakshmi Ammal
Judges:
06 January, 2017·This appeal is preferred by the defendant in O.S.No.89 of 1996 on the file of the Principal District Munsif court, Vellore, challenging the order of remand passed by the first appellate court in A.S.No.63 of 2007.2. The short facts relevant for the purpose are that the respondents herein are the pla...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.