R.Venkatasubramanian vs The Union Secretary (Home)
Judges:
09 February, 2017·On earlier occasion i.e. 29.05.2014, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and directed to list the case after vacation. Even today, (09.02.2017) there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in person or through the counsel on record. Therefore, the writ petition i...
Madras High Court
Senthil vs State Rep By The Inspector Of Police
Judges: R Mahadevan
09 February, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09.02.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Crl.O.P.No.2641 of 2017 Senthil ... Petitioner Vs State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Magudanchavadi Police Station, Salem District. ... Respondent ...
Madras High Court
G.Rajendiran vs The Principal Secretary To ...
Judges:
09 February, 2017·By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mr.K.Dhananjayan, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent and Mr.Kannan Kumar, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 2 and 3.2. The petitioner joined the services...
Madras High Court
A K Rajan vs The State
Judges: R Mahadevan
09 February, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09.02.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Crl.O.P.No.2089 of 2017 A.K.Rajan ... Petitioner Vs The State, rep by its The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Thiruvallur District. ... Responde...
Madras High Court
S.Sowmiya vs The Controller Of Examinations
Judges:
09 February, 2017·In view of the representation and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.09.02.2017 cs Copy to1. The Controller of Examinations, Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University, Guindy, Chennai-600 032.2. The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Dr...
Madras High Court
R. Vijayakumar vs Religre Finvest Ltd
Judges:
09 February, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by S.Manikumar,J) Tenant has challenged possession notice, dated 26/12/2016 and the auction notice, dated 7/1/2017, on various grounds.2. Section 17 (1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 states that Any person (including borrower), aggrieved by any of the measures referred to i...
Madras High Court
S.K.S.Subramaniam ..Revision vs S.K.S.Palanis @ Palanisamy
Judges:
09 February, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition is filed, challenging the fair and decreetal order passed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirupur, in I.A.No.1300 of 2012, in O.S.No.4 of 2005, dated 11.03.2014.2. The plaintiff, who filed the afore said suit for partition and separate possessio...
Madras High Court
B.Anand Kumar vs Dr.R.Vijaya Karthikeyan
Judges:
09 February, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) There has undoubtedly been a non compliance of the order dated 22.7.2015, but the learned counsel for the respondent Corporation states that two weeks time may be given for compliance.2. We take the aforesaid statement on record and dispose ...
Madras High Court
S.Sakunthala vs The Union Of India
Judges:
09 February, 2017·K.K. SASIDHARAN,J.The learned counsel for the petitioners made an endorsement indicating that in view of the order dated 11 January 2017 in the connected writ petition in W.P.No.44200 of 2016, he is not pressing the writ petition.2. In view of the endorsement so made, the writ petition is dismissed ...
Madras High Court
Shenbagavalli vs S.Santha
Judges:
09 February, 2017·Civil Revision Petition has been filed to direct the Additional District Court, Chengalpet to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.159 of 2007 within the time frame.2.The petitioners/plaintiffs invoking <act id=zbGxPokB_szha0nWKNIH section=227>Article 227 </act>of the Constitution of India have moved the C...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.