IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. NARENDAR WRIT PETITION NO. 49552/2016 (S-DIS) BETWEEN M.M. JHANSI W/O. SRI M.S. VIJAYA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO.1147, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, CHAMARAJAPURAM, MYSORE-570 004.
(BY SRI RAKSHIT K.N. ADVOCATE) ... PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KARNATAKA STATE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., NO.49, 2ND FLOOR, "KHANIJA BHAVANA", RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI T.S. MAHANTESH, AGA FOR R1; SRI GURURAJ JOSHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO IMPLEMENT THE ORDER OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA IN W.P.NO.6171/1992 AND W.A.NO.49619/2003 VIDE ANNEXURE-B, ETC..
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING.
O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for respondent No.2.
2. The learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the petitioner has already retired and retirement emoluments have been settled.
3. Per contra, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the calculation of the benefits is contrary to the orders passed by this Court in the earlier round of litigation. In the instant petition what is sought for is implementation of the orders passed by this Court in WP No.6171/1992 and W.A. No.49619/2003.
4. The submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents that the retirement benefits have been settled to the petitioner is placed on record. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the quantum, then liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach such Authority or Forum in accordance with law to seek redressal of her grievances.
With these observations, the petition stands disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE SBS/-