IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF JANUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3817 OF 2016 BETWEEN:
1. SMT. LALITHA M WIFE OF MRUTHUNJAYA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, PRESIDENT, SRI SHARADA MAHILA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., JAYACHAMARAJENDRA ROAD, TUMKUR-572 101.
2. SMT. SHOBHA B AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI. SHARADA MAHILA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., JAYACHAMARAJENDRA ROAD, TUMKUR-572 101.
3. SMT. RUDRANI WIFE OF BASAVARAJ, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, ACCOUNTANT SRI. SHARADA MAHILA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., JAYACHAMARAJENDRA ROAD, TUMKUR-572 101. ... PETITIONERS (By Sri. FAYAZ SAB B G, ADVOCATE – ABSENT) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR TUMKUR TOWN POLICE STATION, B.H.ROAD, TUMKUR TOWN, TUMKUR-572 101.
2. KUM. T.S. VANI D/O. T.L. SHIVARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, BANASHANKARI MAIN ROAD, A.S.K. PALYA, OPPOSITE 3RD CROSS, TUMKUR-572 103. ... RESPONDENTS (By Sri.NASRULLA KHAN, HCGP FOR R1) ---
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH/SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 11.02.2016 PASSED IN P.C.R.NO.7/2016 ON THE FILE OF PRL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND C.J.M., TUMAKURU AND PURSUANT TO THE SAID ORDER REGISTRATION OF FIR IN CR.NO.45/2016 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES P/U/S 409,468,474,477A OF THE IPC, WHICH ARE PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURES-A AND C.
THIS CRL.P COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Petitioners and their counsel are absent.
2. Heard learned HCGP. Perused the records.
3. This petition is filed under section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the order dated 11.02.2016 in PCR.No.7/2016 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Tumakuru and to quash the FIR in Crime No.45/2016 registered for the offences punishable under sections 409, 468, 474 and 477A of Indian Penal Code.
3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned HCGP submits that after investigation, the jurisdictional police have submitted ‘B’ report before the Magistrate.
4. In view of the said submission, the petition does not survive for consideration.
Hence, the petition is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE Bss