Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Kuldeep Yadav vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|07 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30094 of 2021 Applicant :- Kuldeep Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Kamlesh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Heard Sri Kamlesh Singh, learned counsel for the applicant; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record of the case.
The present bail application has been filed on behalf of applicant Kuldeep Yadav, under Section 439 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 425 of 2021 under Section 15 of Uttar Pradesh Dacoity Affected Areas, Act, 1983, registered at Police Station Etmaddaula, District Agra, during pendency of the trial.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. First Information Report of the alleged incident has been lodged on the basis of false and frivolous allegations against applicant and four other accused persons. It is further submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the applicant; alleged recovery of 10 mobiles is made without complying with the mandatory provisions of Section 100 Cr.P.C.; there is no independent / public witness of the aforesaid recovery. The applicant has no previous history his credit. Charge -sheet has been submitted on 08.0-7.2021 the applicant is no more required for the purposes of investigation. It is lastly submitted that after arrest of the applicant in the aforesaid case, he has also been implicated in two other criminal cases. The applicant, who is languishing in jail since 23.06.202, undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted. It has also been pointed out that in the wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any early conclusion of trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail and has not pointed out any other criminal case except the aforesaid criminal case.
Upon considering the totality of facts, nature and evidence reflected from record and also taking into consideration the provision of Section 10 of D.A.A, Act and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for bail. Hence, the present bail application is allowed.
Let applicant, Kuldeep Yadav, be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions-
(i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(ii) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses.
(iii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 of Cr.P.C.
(iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in the trial court.
(v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by the applicant along-with a self attested identity proof of the said person (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number to which the said Aadhar Card is linked.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 7.10.2021 aks
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kuldeep Yadav vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
07 October, 2021
Judges
  • Sanjay Kumar Pachori
Advocates
  • Kamlesh Singh