Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

K.Shanmugaiah vs The Superintendent Of Police

Madras High Court|09 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This petition has been filed for a direction to the respondent to alter the First Information Reprot in Crime No.123 of 2013 dated 19.04.2013 as per the appropriate sections of law.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) for the respondents.
3. Today, Mr.S.Packiaraj, Special Sub Inspector of Police, Surandai Police Station, is present before this Court.
4.The petitioner has filed a petition in Crl.M.P.No.1291/2017 under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., in which, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangulam, has passed the following order on 15.05.2017:
?Heard petitioner side. Records perused. This Court find prima facie case to be proceeded against this respondent in accordance with law. Hence, this Court is hereby inclined to forward this complaint to the Inspector of Police, Surandai P.S. For necessary action.
Accordingly, this complaint is hereby forwarded to the Inspector of Police, Surandai PS. On receipt of this complaint, he has investigate the same as per guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Lalithakumari case. The investigation shall be completed on or before 30.05.2017 of the receipt of this complaint without fail. The final report shall be filed before this Court on or before call on 31.05.2017.? Now, it is the grievance of the petitioner that despite the order, the police have not registered the FIR.
5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side), on instructions, submitted that the petitioner had given a complaint dated 03.01.2017 to the Inspector of Police, Surandai Police Station and the same was enquired into and was closed on 08.03.2017. A copy of the closure report was not furnished to the petitioner. After the learned Judicial Magistrate passed the order on 15.05.2017, the police have filed a report on 30.05.2017 before the concerned Magistrate.
6. Recording the same, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to file a private complaint, if so advised.
7. Before parting with this case, this Court is constrained to make the following observations:
The learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangulam ought not to have directed the Inspector of Police, Surandai Police Station, to complete the investigation before 30.05.2017. Essentially, an investigation in a case would commence only after registration of the FIR under Section 154 Cr.P.C. The Court should be very circumspect, while issuing a direction to the police to complete an investigation as defined under Section 2(h) of the Code within a time period. The case may require inter-state investigation or even inter- country investigation and therefore, the upper time limit should not be normally fixed by the Court ex-parte.
The learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangulam may bear this in mind in dealing with such petitions in future.
To:
1.The Superintendent of Police Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli
2.The Inspector of Police Surandai Police Station, Surandai, Tirunelveli District
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai..
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

K.Shanmugaiah vs The Superintendent Of Police

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
09 June, 2017