Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Krishna Sonkar vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41120 of 2019 Applicant :- Krishna Sonkar Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
1. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel for the applicant; as well as Sri Ankit Shrivastav, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant - Krishna Sonkar with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. - 123 of 2019, under Sections -354, 504, 506 I.P.C. & 7/8 POCSO Act, Police Station - Jiyanpar, District - Azamgarh, during pendency of trial.
3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, at present:
(i) the applicant is accused of sexual harassment, criminal intimidation and offence under the POCSO Act, punishable with imprisonment of five years;
(ii) against FIR lodged on 11.06.2019, the applicant is in confinement since 29.08.2019;
(iii) the applicant claims to have cooperated in the investigation. In any case he is not shown to have unduly evaded arrest;
(iv) the applicant has no criminal history;
(v) chargesheet has already been submitted yet there is no hope of early conclusion of the trial;
(vi) on prima facie basis only, it has been submitted that there exist other dispute between the parties which have given the colour of allegation in the present case. Further, it has been submitted that the victim has herself denied the allegation in her subsequent statement recorded during investigation;
(vii) in any case, no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State and that the applicant, if enlarged on bail would either tamper with the evidence or delay the trial.
4. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the final merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressuring the witness, during the investigation or trial.
(ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
5. In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, the bail being granted shall be cancelled.
6. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 27.11.2019 S.Chaurasia
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Krishna Sonkar vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 November, 2019
Judges
  • Saumitra Dayal Singh
Advocates
  • Arvind Kumar Upadhyay