Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Kasimuthu Pillai vs The Tahsildar And Others

Madras High Court|04 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that he is not pressing the Writ Petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Index : No 04.09.2017 Internet : Yes va To
1. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Vandavasi, Tiruvannamalai District.
2. The Executive Engineer, Office of the Executive Engineer, Salem Division, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5/1, Ramakrishna Road, Salem – 636 607.
W.P.No.587 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.426 of 2016
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kasimuthu Pillai vs The Tahsildar And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
04 September, 2017
Judges
  • M Duraiswamy

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.