Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

K.A.Kuppusamy vs Gulli @ Perumal

Madras High Court|10 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel for the respondent present. No representation for the appellant. Appellant called absent.
2.Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution with cost. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
10.02.2017 dn To
1.The Subordinate Judge, Harur.
2.The District Munsif Court, Harur.
S.A.No.646 of 2011 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

K.A.Kuppusamy vs Gulli @ Perumal

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
10 February, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.