Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Kailashbhai vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|01 May, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicants have prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with Prohibition CR No.III-130 of 2012 registered with Chhotaudepur Police Station, for the offence punishable under Sections 66B, 65AE, 116B, 77, 81, 82, 83 and 108 of Bombay Prohibition Act.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Mr.Zubin Bharda and Mr.L.B.Dabhi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State.
In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of offence and sentence awardable, without entering into the merits of the case, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion to enlarge the applicants on bail.
Hence, the applicants are ordered to be released on bail in connection with Prohibition CR No.III-130 of 2012 registered with Chhotaudepur Police Station for the offence alleged against them in this application on each of them executing personal bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twentyfive thousand only) with one local solvent surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that -
a) they shall not take undue advantage of liberty or abuse liberty;
b) they shall not to try to tamper or pressurise the prosecution witnesses or complainant in any manner;
c) they shall maintain law and order and should cooperate the Investigating Officer;
d) they shall not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;
e) they shall not leave India without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;
f) furnish their permanent address of their residence with documentary proof to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this Court;
g) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month more particularly between 1st and 10th of month between 10.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m. for six months;
h) surrender their passport, if any, to the lower Court within a week.
If the breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the concerned Court will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.
Bail before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It would be open to the trial Court concerned to give time to furnish the solvency certificate if prayed for. Rule is made absolute. Direct service is permitted.
At the trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicants on bail.
[M.D.SHAH,J.] radhan Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kailashbhai vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
01 May, 2012