The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 & 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.12.2016.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that inspite of the petitioner's representation dated 26.12.2016, the respondents 1 & 2 have not considered the same yet.
3. Mr.M.Maharaja, learned Special Government Pleader taking notice for the respondents submitted that the 2nd respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation in accordance with law.
4. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in the Writ Petition, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.12.2016 and pass orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Index : No 09.06.2017 Internet : Yes va/nl To
1. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Act, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam High Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
2. The Joint commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Act, Dr. Nanjappa Road, Coimbatore.
3. The Executive Officer, Chellandiamman Temple Premises, Kunathur Road, Perundurai M.DURAISWAMY, J.
va/nl W.P.No.14402 of 2017 and W.M.P. No. 15617 of 2017 09.06.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in