Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

J.Vijayalakshmi vs N.Indira

Madras High Court|02 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the matter has been settled between the parties and therefore, he is not pressing this contempt petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed. No costs.
02.06.2017 cse Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order To
1.Mr.Sampath Inspector of Police, K.10, Koyambedu Police Station, Koyambedu, Chennai-600 107.
2.Madhu Vikaram Sub-Inspector of Police, K.10, Koyambedu Police Station, Koyambedu, Chennai-600 107.
CONTEMPT PETITION No.2091 of 2016 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

J.Vijayalakshmi vs N.Indira

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
02 June, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.