IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR W.P.NO. 31771/2013 (LR-RES) BETWEEN:
1. JNANACHANDRA KULU S/O LATE JWALINI AMMA AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS SINCE DECEASED BY LRs:
1(a) VINAYA W/O LATE JNANACHANDRA KULUR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.
1(b) HARSHITH MADAYI S/O LATE JNANACHANDRA KULUR AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS.
APPLICANTS (a) AND (b) ARE R/AT MADAYI HOUSE SANGABETTU VILLAGE P.O. SIDDAKATTE – 574 237 BANTWAL TALUK (DK).
1(c) SMT. CHAYA D/O LATE JNANACHANDRA KULUR W/O BHARATH KUMAR JAIN AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS R/AT PADMABHA, HENTANE MANE IRVATHUR VILLAGE AND POST BANTWAL TALUK (DK).
2. VEERENDRA S/O JNANACHANDRA KULUR AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS.
BOTH ARE R/AT MADAYI HOUSE SANGABETTU VILLAGE P.O. SIDDAKATE – 574 237.
... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUDHAKAR PAI M, ADVOCATE FOR (P-1(A-C) & P-2;
AMENDED VIDE ORDER DATED:08.04.2014) AND:
1. SEETHU HENGSU W/O MONAPPA POOJARY AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT MADAYIBAILU SANGABETTU VILLAGE P.O. SIDDAKATTE – 574 237 BANTWAL TALUK (DK) 2. MINGEL MORAS.
SINCE DECEASED BY LRs:
(a) JILLU MORAS BAI D/O MINGEL MORAS AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS.
(b) KARMINA MORAS BAI D/O MINGEL MORAS AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS.
(c) CYRIL MORAS S/O MINGEL MORAS AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS.
(d) CIVIL MORAS BAI D/O MINGEL MORAS AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS.
(e) PHILOMINA MORAS BAI D/O MINGEL MORAS AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS.
(f) MARK MORAS S/O MINGEL MORAS AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.
(g) MARY SEQUEIRA W/O MINGEL MORAS AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS.
RESPONDENTS 2(a) TO (g) ARE ALL R/AT MADAYIBAILU SANGABETTU VILLAGE P.O. SIDDAKATTE – 574 237 BANTWAL TALUK (DK).
3. ROBERT MORAS S/O LATE MINGEL MORAS AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT MADAYIBAILU SANGABETTU VILLAGE P.O. SIDDAKATEE – 574 237 BANTWAL TALUK (DK).
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRASANNA V.R, ADVOCATE FOR R-2(c) R-2(d) SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED;
R-3 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED V/O DATED:02.08.2019 STEPS NOT TAKEN TILL DATE IN R/O R-2(b, e & f) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED:21.08.2012 ON IA NO.XI IN RA 99/06 ON THE FILE OF THE SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANTWAL D.K. VIDE ANX-K.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR OREDER ON MEMO THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R This petition has been filed by learned counsel appearing for petitioners challenging the order dated 21.08.2012 passed in R.A.No.99/2006 on I.A.No.XI.
Memo has been filed on 06.08.2019 by learned counsel appearing for petitioners stating thereunder that R.A.No.99/2006 was disposed of on 21.04.2016. Hence, placing said memo on record, this petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
SD/- JUDGE RU