Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

J.John Britto vs The Special Grade Executive ...

Madras High Court|05 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.] By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the sole respondent.
2 The petitioner would state that the property in question along with the other properties were jointly allotted through a registered Partition Deed dated 30.06.1997 bearing Doc.No.843/1997 on the file of the jurisdictional Sub Registrar and according to him since the building is very old building, he started to repair the same and he has not put up any new or further construction. However, to his shock and surprise, he has been issued with the impugned notice dated 14.07.2017 by the respondent invoking sections 200, 210, 204 and 216[1] of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920, for which, the petitioner has submitted his response in the form of representation dated 22.07.2017 and without considering the same, further action is taken to demolish the alleged offending construction and hence, the petitioner came forward to file the present writ petition.
3 The Court heard the submission of Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the sole respondent.
4 Section 216 speaks about the demolition or alteration of building work unlawfully commenced, carried on or completed and sub-section [3] says if the owner fails to show cause to the satisfaction of the Executive Authority, the Executive Authority may confirm the order with any modification he may think fit to make, and such order shall, then, be binding on the owner. 5 The petitioner has submitted his response to the impugned notice personally and in the light of the facts and circumstances, this Court directs the petitioner to respond to the impugned notice in the form of written representation by Registered Post Acknowledgment Due to the respondent along with necessary and authenticated documents within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the respondent, on receipt of the same, shall afford an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and thereafter, consider and dispose of the said representation on merits and in accordance with law within a M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.
AND N.SESHASAYEE, J.
AP further period of four weeks thereafter and till such time, shall defer further decision, in terms of the impugned notice dated 14.07.2017.
10 The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

J.John Britto vs The Special Grade Executive ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
05 September, 2017