Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

M/S.Jindal Dyechem Industries ... vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) ...

Madras High Court|03 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

WMP No.2642 of 2017 (To Dispense with) in WP No.2695 of 2017
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
WP No.2695 of 2017 and WMP No.2643 of 2017
2. Issue notice. Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 2.1. With the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal.
3. In effect, the main grievance of the petitioner appears to be disallowance of refund of Compounding fee, which was ordered in its favour, vide order dated 30.01.2017.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner concedes that there is no provision under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, for suo-motu adjustment of refund, against monthly returns, notwithstanding the fact that via the order dated 30.01.2017, the Commercial Tax Officer, Group VII, Enforcement (Central), Chennai, has ordered refund, in favour of the petitioner, in the sum of Rs.1,17,32,560/-. 4.1. It is stated by the counsel for the petitioner that the voucher for the refunded amount, i.e., Rs.1,17,30,560/- (Rupees one crore seventeen lakhs thirty thousand five hundred and sixty only), has not been issued to the petitioner, as yet.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that in so far as the impugned order is concerned, the petitioner will take recourse to an appropriate proceeding in accordance with the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, and therefore, liberty be given to withdraw the captioned writ petition.
6. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for.
7. Needless to say, if a refund order has been issued in favour of the petitioner, the concerned authority will expedite the process of refunding the amount, albeit, in accordance with law.
8. Consequently, pending application shall also stand closed. No costs.
03.02.2017 Note : Issue order copy on 07.02.2017 gg To The Assistant Commissioner (CT) (FAC), Moormarket Assessment Circle, Chennai.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.
gg W.P.No.2695 of 2017 03.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S.Jindal Dyechem Industries ... vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
03 February, 2017