IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION Nos.8738-8739/2019(GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1. Jessi (Jiaxie Yu) W/o H.N.Prashanth Aged about 35 years, No.2719, 2nd Floor, 31st Main, 16th Cross, Sector-1 HSR Layout, Bengaluru.
And also Building No.10, 3rd floor, No.1376, Changuning Road, Shanghai, China.
And also Residing at No.427/1, 7th A Cross, 12th A Main, Behind Mosque, yelahanka New town Bengaluru North, Bengaluru-560 064.
2. Sri.H.N.Prashanth S/ Nagabhushana.H.M, Aged about 46 years No. 2719, 2nd floor, 31st Main, 16th Cross, Sector-I HSR Layout, Bengaluru.
And also Residing at No.427/1, 7th A Cross, 12th A Main, Behind Mosque, Yelahanka New Town Bengaluru North, Bengaluru-560 064.
…Petitioners (By Smt.Sudha B, Advocate) AND:
1. The Commissioner of Police Infantry Road, Bengaluru-56 001.
2. The State of Karnataka By commercial Street Police Station Bengaluru.
Represented by its Government Pleader High Court of Karnataka at Dr.Ambedkar Veedhi Bengaluru-560 009.
3. Sri.Faya Ahmed Khan Aged about 40 years Police Officer D.J.Halli Police Station, Devarajeevanahalli Bengaluru-560 045.
4. Inspector of Police Commercial Street Police Station Shivajinagar, Bengaluru-560 001.
5. Sub-Inspector of Police Commercial Street Police Station Shivajinagar, Bengaluru-560 001.
6. Sri.Lingaraju Constable Sheshadripuram Police Station Bengaluru-560 020.
…Respondents (By Sri.S.Rachaiah, HCGP for R1,R2, R4 and R5).
These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India, praying to quash the entire proceedings in C.C.No.51757/2017 (Crime No.101/2016) dated 20.02.2017 for the offences punishable under Section 332, 353, 504 read with 34 of IPC, registered by the commercial Street Police Station, against the petitioners vide Annexure-C.
These Writ Petitions coming on for Preliminary Hearing this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners intend to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach Jurisdictional Court to discharge and seeks leave of the Court.
Memo filed to the said effect is placed on record.
It is made clear that no opinion is expressed on the merits of the case.
Hence, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/- JUDGE ag