Janta vs Navin

It is represented by Mr.Dipak R. Dave, learned advocate for the applicant and Mr.Sunil S. Joshi, learned advocate for respondent No.3 that the main matter, being Company Application No.272 of 2011 in O.L.R. No.265 of 2007 in Company Petition No.173 of 2003, is listed before another Court.

In this view of the matter, as the present application is for impleadment of the applicant in Company Application No.272 of 2011, it would be appropriate that the present application be listed before the same Court that is hearing the main matter.

(Smt.

Abhilasha Kumari, J.) rakesh/ Top