Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Jai Prakash vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 17656 of 2018 Petitioner :- Jai Prakash Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Pandey,Nandlal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner.
The petitioner in the writ petition is seeking quashing of the order dated 28.8.2017 whereby his claim for appointment on the post of Review Officer has been rejected.
Prima-facie the writ petition is barred by laches of almost one year. The only explanation is given in paragraph 25 of the writ petition where the petitioner has stated that he was preparing for the competitive examination and therefore, there has been some delay in filing the writ petition.
In our opinion, this is no ground for condonation of delay and laches in challenging the impugned order.
The writ petition is dismissed as barred by laches.
Order Date :- 20.8.2018 nd
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jai Prakash vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 August, 2018
Judges
  • B Amit Sthalekar
Advocates
  • Santosh Kumar Pandey Nandlal