Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Jagdish Prasad Mishra vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 November, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 41
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 26331 of 2017 Petitioner :- Jagdish Prasad Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajeev Kumar Singh,Ravikar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajesh Dayal Khare,J. Hon'ble Mahboob Ali,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A. G. A. for the State.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to quash the F.I.R. dated 01.09.2017 lodged in Case Crime No.433 of 2017, under Section 409 I.P.C., and Section 3/4 of Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, Police Station Kotwali Chunar, District Mirzapur.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after 19 years of the alleged incident and after 11 years of the retirement of the petitioner, the present proceedings has been initiated against the petitioner which is bad in law. He further submitted that apart from the bald allegations made in the F.I.R., which is a bundle of lies and product of malice, no credible evidence is forthcoming, even prima facie, indicating that any such incident had taken place, hence the impugned F. I. R. is liable to be quashed.
Per contra, learned A. G. A. submitted that from the perusal of the impugned F.I.R. it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out, hence the impugned F.I.R., is not liable to be quashed.
From the perusal of the F.I.R. it appears that on the basis of the allegations made therein prima facie cognizable offence is made out hence, there is no scope for interfering with the impugned F.I.R.
Therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned F. I. R. is refused.
However, considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and nature of allegations made in the F. I. R., it is directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested in the aforementioned case till submission of police report under Section 173 (2) or till credible evidence is collected, whichever is earlier.
With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of finally.
Order Date :- 28.11.2017 S.Ali
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jagdish Prasad Mishra vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 November, 2017
Judges
  • Rajesh Dayal Khare
Advocates
  • Rajeev Kumar Singh Ravikar Pandey