Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Honey @ Nonu And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21989 of 2019 Petitioner :- Honey @ Nonu And 6 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chitranshu Srivastav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Ashwini Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
Heard Sri Chitranshu Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A.
This writ petition has been filed, seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent concerned, not to arrest the petitioners, with a further prayer for quashing the impugned FIR dated 03.09.2019 in Case Crime No.0794 of 2019, under Sections 498-A, 323, 377, 376, 511, 506, 307, 354 I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P.
Act, Police Station-Kankarkhera, District-Meerut. Learned AGA has opposed the submission.
The correctness of the allegations would have to be tested on the basis of the materials collected during the course of investigation as by insertion of Notification No.1058/79-V-1- 19-1 (Ka)-20-2018 dated 6th June 2019, an alternate remedy is available to the petitioners to seek for an anticipatory bail. We deem it appropriate to dismiss this petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to apply for anticipatory bail.
The writ petition is dismissed.
It is made clear that we have not adjudicated the contentions raised which are left open for the petitioners to raise at an appropriate stage in an appropriate proceeding, in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 26.9.2019 Vibha Singh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Honey @ Nonu And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 September, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Naqvi
Advocates
  • Chitranshu Srivastav