Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Himanshu vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4437 of 2018 Petitioner :- Himanshu Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Avnish Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Govind Mathur,J. Hon'ble Rajiv Lochan Mehrotra,J.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Avnish Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent no.3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been arrested. Hence, the writ petition has become infructuous.
The writ petition is dismissed as per the statement given by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Order Date :- 22.2.2018 Bhaskar (Rajiv Lochan Mehrotra, J.) (Govind Mathur, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Himanshu vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 February, 2018
Judges
  • Govind Mathur
Advocates
  • Sunil Kumar Tiwari