Mr Shunnu Sab @ Sunnu Sab vs Mr B H Gowdru
Judges: P B Bajanthri
05 November, 2019·Mr. Shunnu Sab @ Sunnu Sab, S/o Pyaru Sab, Aged about 46 years, Resident of Horpete, Chithradurga-577 501. …Petitioner (Sri.Venugopal M.S., Advocate) AND Mr. B.H.Gowdru, S/o C.K.Bheemanna, Aged about 48 years, Residing near BESCOM Office, Holalkere Road, Chitradurga-577501. …...
High Court Of Karnataka
Shri T Hemantha
Judges: K N Phaneendra
05 November, 2019·STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ANEKAL POLICE STATION, ANEKAL, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE-560 001. ... PETITIONERS ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI: HONNAPPA, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR...
High Court Of Karnataka
Arjun vs State By Hennur
Judges: K N Phaneendra
05 November, 2019·State by Hennur P.S. Bangalore-560 043. Represented by The State Public Prosecutor High Court of Karnataka High Court Building Bangalore-560 001. (By Sri. Rohith B.J., HCGP) …Petitioner …Respondent This Criminal Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in...
High Court Of Karnataka
Manjunath V And Others vs Eep Katti
Judges: K N Phaneendra
05 November, 2019·REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE-560 001. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI: HONNAPPA, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONERS ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THEIR ARREST IN CRIME NO.172/2017 OF VIDYANAGAR P.S., D...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Manager vs Sri Sonnegowda
Judges: P B Bajanthri
05 November, 2019·Represented by Prabir Kumar Mitra Ass. Director. …Petitioner (Sri. Vivek.S., Advocate) AND Sri. Sonnegowda, Aged about 42 years, S/o Late. Gopallappa, Proprietor, Sri.Venkatadri Constructions, Residing at No.2980, 1st Main, 1st Cross, New Extension, Near Doom Light Circle, Kolar...
High Court Of Karnataka
Ismail Zabiulla Khan vs Basavaraj Laxmappa Mulgund No 161/B1 And Others
Judges: S G Pandit
05 November, 2019·THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The claimant is in appeal not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the judgment and award dated 19.09.2014 passed in MVC No.1930/2013 on the file of the MACT,...
High Court Of Karnataka
M Khasim Sab vs The Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co Ltd And Others
Judges: S G Pandit
05 November, 2019·2. The claim petition was filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, claiming compensation for the accidental injuries suffered by the claimant in a road traffic accident. It is stated that on 07.02.2014 when the claimant was proceeding as a driver in Tata 1109 vehicle bearing registra...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Claim Manager Tata Aig vs Anjanamurthy H S And Others
Judges: S G Pandit M
05 November, 2019·...APPELLANT …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.O MAHESH, ADV. FOR R2 R1, R3 & R4- NOTICE D/W V/O DT:19.01.2016) THIS M.F.A. FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 17.04.2015 PASSED IN MVC.NO.791/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE 18TH ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.