A Manjunatha Shetty vs A Bhagavan And Others
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao
02 January, 2019·..APPELLANT 3. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VINAYAKA COMPLEX GARDEN AREA SHIMOGA – 577 201 BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. ..RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B S UMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R-3, R-1 IS SERVED, NOTICE TO R-2 IS DISPENSED WITH V/O DATED:06.01.2015) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAI...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Manager The United India Insurance vs P Susheela And Others
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao M
02 January, 2019·…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI O MAHESH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2, NOTICE TO R-1 IS DISPENSED WITH V/O DTD.5.1.11) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:7.10.2009 PASSED IN MVC No.310/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) AND ADDITIONAL MACT, UDUPI, PARTLY ALLOWI...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Maruthi Shetty vs Sri Ramakrishna K Shetty And Others
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao
02 January, 2019·JUDGMENT This appeal is directed against the judgment and award passed by the learned Member, Fast Track Court & MACT, Kundapura, on 30.09.2009 in MVC No.1231/2003 filed by appellant herein, which came to be allowed in part and the claimant was awarded with a compensation of Rs.1,53,600/- together w...
High Court Of Karnataka
Vani T C W/O
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao
02 January, 2019·9. After service of notice respondent-KSRTC appeared through its counsel and resisted the petition by filing written statement. Learned Member after considering the oral and documentary evidence and materials on record came to the conclusion that the petitioners are entitled for total compensation ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Dr Meera T Aantoo W/O Swaroop And Others vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Krishna S Dixit
02 January, 2019·3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACUISITION OFFICER MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JHANSI LAKSHMI BAI ROAD MYSORE – 570005. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. DILDAR SHIRALLI, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. T P VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & 3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Dr C Nagarathna D/O Late B H Chandraiah And Others vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: R Devdas
02 January, 2019·5. DR. NAGARAJA G P S/O. LATE. PUTTANNA GR, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, WORKING AS PHYSICAL EDUCATION, DIRECTOR I/C PRINCIPAL, SRI. T V VENKATASWAMY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, MADHUGIRI -572 132, TUMKUR DISTRICT. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE BY BAJENTRI ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATE) AND 1. STATE OF...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Nilima vs Sri N Guruprasad And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
02 January, 2019·Mr.N.Mahalinga Bhat, learned Counsel for respondent No.1 Mr.K.S.Ramesh, learned Counsel for respondent No.2. Petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of the parties, the same is heard finally. 2. In this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Ramu G vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Dinesh Maheshwari, Aravind Kumar
02 January, 2019·1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE – 560 001 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SHIVAMOGGA SUB DIVISION SHIVAMOGGA – 577 201 ... PETITIONER 3. THE THASILDAR SHIVAMOGGA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA – 577 201 (BY SHRI D.NAGARAJ, AGA) --- .....
High Court Of Karnataka
Prabhakar And Others vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Dinesh Maheshwari, Aravind Kumar
02 January, 2019·1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD BENGALURU – 560 001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOPPAL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOPPAL – 583 231 3. THE TAHASILDAR KUSHTAGI TALUK OFFICE OF THE THASILDAR KUSHTAGI, K...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mr K O Ramaswamy Reddy vs The Commissioner Bangalore Development Authority T Chowdaiah
Judges: Krishna S Dixit
02 January, 2019·THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAKRUPA WEST BANGALORE-560020 (BY SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE) ... PETITIONER ... RESPONDENT THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT BDA TO CO...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.