K Shadakshari vs Smt R M Madhu Kumari And Others
Judges: S Sujatha
13 February, 2019·K SHADAKSHARI S/O LATE KALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, NO.455/A, "SHIVAKRUPA", 4TH MAIN ROAD, K.R.EXTENSION, TIPUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572202 ALSO R/AT ROOM NO.154 & 155, LEGISLATURES HOME AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001 ... PETITIONER [BY SRI M.KESHAVA REDDY, ADV.] AND: 1. S...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Commissioner And Others
Judges: S Sunil Dutt Yadav
13 February, 2019·1. The Commissioner, Tumkur City Corporation, Tumkur – 572 102. 2. The Executive Engineer, Tumkur City Corporation, Tumkur – 572 102. 3. The Revenue Officer, Tumkur City Corporation, Tumkur – 572 102. … Respondents (By Smt. K.M. Nanditha, Advocate for Sri Subramanya R., Advocate) Th...
High Court Of Karnataka
Nasima Khanum W/O Mohammed Ibrahim And Others vs District Legal Services Authority Court Complex And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
13 February, 2019·2. TALUK LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY COURT COMPLEX SORABA - 577429 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. POLICE CIRCLE INSPECTOR SORABA CIRCLE SORABA - 577429 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. 4. CHIEF OFFICER TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL SORABA - 577429 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. 5. M S VENKATESH GUDIGAR, MAJOR OL...
High Court Of Karnataka
Shivashankar K S And Others vs State Of Karnataka Urban Development And Others
Judges: L Narayana Swamy, P S Dinesh Kumar
13 February, 2019·THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the prayers sought in the writ petition have already been complied by the respondents and hence, the petition has become infruct...
High Court Of Karnataka
G R Suryanarayan vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
13 February, 2019·3. Superintendent of Police, Tumakuru – 572 103. 4. The Circle Inspector, Koratagere Police Station, Tumakuru District – 572 103. (By Sri. Vijay Kumar A. Patil, AGA) … Respondents This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the R1 to R3 to ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt J Philomena W/O Sri C And Others vs N Harsha And Others
Judges: S Sujatha
13 February, 2019·3. J THOMAS AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. 4. J JULIANA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. 5. SMT J ROSELINE AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. 2 TO 5 CHILDREN OF SRI C JOSEPH ALL ARE R/O NO.153, KAMMANAHALLI St. THOMAS TOWN POST BANGALORE-560084 ALSO AT NO.124, GREEN INDIA DAISY APT., 1ST CROSS, CHOWRAPPA LAYOUT, SUBBAIYANAPALYA,...
High Court Of Karnataka
Shafiulla Baig vs Karnataka State Board Of Auqaf And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
13 February, 2019·R/at No.2703/1, MKDK Road, 5th Cross, Mandi Mohalla, Mysuru – 570 021. 5. Abdul Salam, S/o late Fairoz, Aged about 47 years, Secretary, Managing Committee, Dargahi Masjid, Sawday Road, Mandi Mohalla, Mysuru – 570 021. R/at No.2211, Sawday Road, Lashkar Mohalla, Mysuru – 570 021. 6. Mohammed Ghaya...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Texport Creation Registered Partnership vs Sri T M Rajkumar And Others
Judges: S Sujatha
13 February, 2019·... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI R B SADASIVAPPA, ADV. FOR C/R1, R2 TO R4.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD:28.4.2018 PASSED BY THE XVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY [CCH NO.12] ON IA...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt J Philomena W/O Sri C And Others vs N Harsha And Others
Judges: S Sujatha
13 February, 2019·3. J THOMAS AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. 4. J JULIANA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. 5. SMT J ROSELINE AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. 2 TO 5 CHILDREN OF SRI C JOSEPH ALL ARE R/O NO.153, KAMMANAHALLI St. THOMAS TOWN POST BANGALORE-560084 ALSO AT NO.124, GREEN INDIA DAISY APT., 1ST CROSS, CHOWRAPPA LAYOUT, SUBBAIYANAPALYA,...
High Court Of Karnataka
Krishna And Others vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: L Narayana Swamy, P S Dinesh Kumar
13 February, 2019·THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Petitioners, who are the villagers, have filed this public interest litigation seeking to quash notices issued under Form No.54 by respondent No.4. 2. By the said notices, objections were ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.