Sri Muniraju And Others
Judges: S G Pandit Civil
01 August, 2019·4. SRI. R.M.GOPALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O LATE MOTAPPA, 5. SMT. AKKAYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, W/O LATE DODDAMUNIYAPPA, 6. SMT. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, W/O CHIKKARAGHAVAPPA, D/O LATE DODDAMUNIYAPPA, 7. SMT. SARVAKKA @ SARVAMANGALAMMA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, W/O NARANASWAMY, D/O ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Muniyamma W/O And Others vs Smt Muniyamma W/O Late Pullappa And Others
Judges: Ashok G Nijagannavar, B V Nagarathna
01 August, 2019·S/O. LATE SRI.CHIKKA YELLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. 9. SMT.SUNANDA W/O. SRI.VENKATESH C., AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. 10. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O. LATE SRI.VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS. 11. SRI.MUNISWAMAPPA V. S/O. LATE SRI.VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 12. SMT.PRABHAVATHI.C. W/O. SRI.MUN...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Schindler India Private Limited vs Csita Karnataka Central
Judges: B Veerappa Civil
01 August, 2019·Also at its Registered office at B-401/402 Delphi Hiranandani Business Park Powai – 400 076 Mumbai, Maharastra India Represented by its Authorized Signatory Shri Suniil B Khajjidoni. ... PETITIONER (By Sri. D.V. Girish - Advocate for Sri Vasanth A.K. – Advocate) AND CSITA Karnataka Central ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Shilpa vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: John Michael Cunha
01 August, 2019·2. The Thasildhar Shikaripura Taluk, Shimoga District – 577 427. (By Sri. Dildar Shiralli, HCGP) … Respondents This Criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to quash the entire proceedings initiated against the petitioner in C.C. No.526/2012 on the file of Judicial Magistrate...
High Court Of Karnataka
G G Naryana Sharma And Others vs Smt Uma W/O N Nagaraju And Others
Judges: Ashok G Nijagannavar, B V Nagarathna
01 August, 2019·... APPELLANTS (BY SRI C. R. SUBRAMANYA, ADVOCATE) AND : 1. SMT. UMA W/O. N. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT #1498/5, RAMA AYYER STREET, KRISHNAMURTHYPURAM, MYSORE-4. 2. SUVARNA W/O. RAJASHEKAR PUROHIT, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, BASAVESHWARA NAGAR, BALLUPET, SAKALESHPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT. 3....
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Koppal Sugappa And Others vs Rashekar P Patil
Judges: John Michael Cunha
01 August, 2019·3. Sri. Basavaraj Ramadurga S/o Prabhu Ramadurga, Aged about 58 years, J.C. Nagar, Karatagi, Tq. Gangavathi, Dist : Koppal – 583 227. (By Sri. Chandrashekar P. Patil, Advocate) AND: Sri. Srihari S/o M.V.V. Sathyanarayana, Aged 43 years, Owner of M/s. Lakshmi Balaji Trading Co., No.1924-48, Near Swa...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Srinivas vs Smt Manjulamma
Judges: John Michael Cunha
01 August, 2019·SRI. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O SRI HANUMANTHAPPA @ PILLAPPA R/A NO.24/1, FIRST FLOOR FIRST CROSS, ANNAIAYPPA BLOCK BENSON TOWN, BANGALORE-560046 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI: V.VINOD REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI: G PAPI REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND SMT. MANJULAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS W/O SRI SRINIVASA R/A NO...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt G Rathnamma And Others vs Smt Narayanamma W/O Kacharakanahalli Narayanappa And Others
Judges: Ashok G Nijagannavar, B V Nagarathna
01 August, 2019·6. SMT. LAKSHMIDEVI D/O. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 6 ARE RESIDING AT KITHIGANOOR VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU - 87. 7. SRI B. M. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O. B.MUNISWAMY GOWDA, MAJOR IN AGE, RESIDING AT NO. 23, SLV NIVAS, 3RD CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, ...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Secretary Shri Harsha Schedule vs The Commissioner Department Of Employment And Training And Others
Judges: P B Bajanthri
01 August, 2019·THE SECRETARY SHRI HARSHA SCHEDULE CAST EDUCATION AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION INSTITUTION (R) INSTITUTE RUNNING IN THE NAME OF SRI GURU BASAVESHWARA INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE (I.T.I) JAGALUR TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT, JAGALURU-577528 …PETITIONER (BY SRI HALESHA R.G., ADV.) AND: 1. THE COMM...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mrs Saroja N Murthy W/O L Narasimha Murthy vs Corporation Bank And Others
Judges: G Narendar
01 August, 2019·2. The petitioner is before this Court praying for the issuance of writ of certiorari and to quash the entire Domestic Enquiry initiated by respondent No.2 against the petitioner vide Communication dated 19.08.2016 at Annexure-G and Communication dated 25.11.2016 vide Annexure-L and Communication ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.