Srinivas N vs K Raju Driver Office Of The Executive Engineer Quality Control
Judges: K N Phaneendra
08 August, 2019·SRINIVAS N. S/O NARASHIMIAH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT NO.123, 2ND CROSS ROAD MANJUNATHA NAGAR ETTUMADU, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE – 560 085 ...APPELLANT (BY SRI R.SRINIVAS, ADVOCATE) AND: K.RAJU (DRIVER) OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION PANCHAYAT ENGINEERING ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt N S Geetha W/O Sri A Srinivasa vs Mrs Leelavathamma W/O Late Subbaiah And Others
Judges: Krishna S Dixit
08 August, 2019·1. MRS.LEELAVATHAMMA W/O.LATE SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS R/AT NO.176, 4TH MAIN II CROSS, DODDANEKKUNDI BANGALORE-560 037 2. SRI B.VIJAY KUMAR S/O.LATE SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.176, 4TH MAIN II CROSS, DODDANEKKUNDI BANGALORE-560 037 3. MRS.VISHALAKSHI W/O.SRI VENKATAGURUNATH D/O.L...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Gangamma vs Smt Puttalakshmamma W/O Late Bylappa And Others
Judges: Krishna S Dixit
08 August, 2019·IN W.P.NOS.53129-53130/2014 BETWEEN: SMT. GANGAMMA, D/O LATE BYLAPPA, W/O MAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO. 129, "MARUTHI NILAYA" 16TH CROSS, BAGALGUNTE, BENGALURU-560 073. (BY SMT. V.P.RUKMANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. PUTTALAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE BYLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 2. SRI. GANGAPPA,...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mr Prakash Poojary vs Mr Dinakara S Poojary And Others
Judges: B V Nagarathna, Ashok G Nijagannavar
08 August, 2019·v. Whether the petitioner is entitled for the compensation amount, if so what is the amount and from whom it is recoverable? vi. What Order or Award ?” 5. The petitioner/injured got examined himself as PW.1 and one witness as PW.2, EXs.P1 to P61 were marked on his behalf. Further, EX.C1 ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Bhaghyalaxmi N W/O B S Mahesh vs Smt Latha Patel
Judges: K N Phaneendra
08 August, 2019·THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the learned counsel for the respondent. 2. I.A.No.2/2016 is filed for seeking special leave to appeal. As this Court has heard the arguments o...
High Court Of Karnataka
The State Of Karnataka
Judges: H P Sandesh, G Narendar
08 August, 2019·7. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, the point that arise for our consideration is as to, “ Whether the Court below has committed an error in convicting the accused for the offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code ?” We proceed to consider the material availa...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Sree Gokulam Chits And Finance Company Pvt Ltd vs Smt Haseena Khan
Judges: K N Phaneendra
08 August, 2019·AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS ... APPELLANT (BY SRI M. ABDUL RAHIMAN, ADVOCATE, ABSENT) AND: SMT. HASEENA KHAN W/O M.A. ZAULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R.K. ENTERPRISES NO.5, VIJAYALAKSHMI COMPLEX M.R. LANE, SJP ROAD CROSS BENGALURU-560 002 ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI A.S. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mr Norbert D’ Souza vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: H T Narendra Prasad
08 August, 2019·THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for the following reliefs: “i) Issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd Respondent to issue Door Number to the residenti...
High Court Of Karnataka
S Manjula @ Manjula Sharma vs Mangalore Electricity Supply Co Ltd And Others
Judges: G Narendar
08 August, 2019·... RESPONDENTS (BY SONA M BADIGER, ADV. FOR R1-R3 – ABSENT.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE FILE FROM THE RESPONDENTS REGARDING COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT APPLICATION MADE BY THE PETITIONER TO THEM, INCLUDING T...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.