Allahabad High Court Judgements

Judges: Bala Krishna Narayana

18 February, 2011·Notice on behalf of the respondent no. 1 has been accepted by learned A.G.A, who prays for and is allowed four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Issue notice to respondent no. 2, who may also file counter affidavit within same period, rejoinder affidavit may be filed within two weeks thereafter....

Judges: Arun Tandon

18 February, 2011·The petitioner in response to as advertisement published by U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board (hereinafter referred to as Board) being Advertisement No. 1/1998 applied for the post of Principal of recognized Intermediate College. He was selected for the post as per the Select Panel n...

Judges: Shri Narayan Shukla

18 February, 2011·The scope of section 321 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been discussed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in several Cases, some of them are referred hereinunder:- (1) Rajender Kumar Jain Vs. State through Special Police Establishment & others (1980) 3 SCC 435. The relevant para 14 is extracted bel...

Judges: Vinod Prasad

18 February, 2011·In joint agreement with both sides, list again on 25.2.2011 peremptorily. Interim order to continue till the next date of listing. Order Date :- 18.2.2011 rkg...

Judges: Satyendra Singh Chauhan

18 February, 2011·Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition. It is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 18.2.2011 BLY...

Judges: Ferdino Inacio Rebello, Chief Justice

18 February, 2011·A similar issue as involved in this case was the subject matter of consideration before the Supreme Court in Shin Satellite Public Co. Ltd. Vs. Jain Studios Ltd., (2006) 2 SCC 628, wherein Justice C.K. Thakker, as a delegate of the learned Chief Justice of India, but exercising judicial powers, has ...

Judges: Bharati Sapru

18 February, 2011·Issue notice to the respondents returnable at an early date fixing 1.4 .2011. In addition to normal mode of service petitioner is directed to serve the respondents by dasti. Steps to be taken within a week. Till 1.4.2011 further proceedings of original suit no.4 of 2010 shall be kept in abeyance. Or...

Judges: Ferdino Inacio Rebello, Chief Justice, Satish Chandra

18 February, 2011·Description of instrument Proper stamp duty "40. Mortgage deed- Not being an agreement relating to deposit of title deeds, pawn or pledge (No.6), Bottomary bond (No.16), mortgage of crop (No.41), respondential bond (No.56) or security bond No.57)- (a) When possession of the property or any part of t...

Judges: Sudhir Agarwal

18 February, 2011·4.It is evident that the respondents are responsible not the petitioner to cause undue delay in payment of retiral benefits to an employee i.e. petitioner particularly when no fault lie on the employee concerned. Deprecating attitude of authorities in harassing its retired employees with respect to ...

Judges: V K Shukla

18 February, 2011·Today there is illness slip of Sri Arun Kumar Srivastava, Advocate. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the respondents that the privilege of sending illness slip is being misused by the counsel for the petitioner. List this case in the next cause list, peremptorily, amongst top ten cas...