Allahabad High Court Judgements

Judges: Vinod Prasad

18 February, 2011·Summon the trial court record. The appellant has been convicted in S.T. No.290 of 2009 for offence under section 304 I.P.C., P.S. Hazara, District Pilibhit and the maximum sentence awarded to him is 7 years RI. It is submitted that according to version of the prosecution as stated by PW-3, retaliato...

Judges: Bala Krishna Narayana

18 February, 2011·Notice on behalf of the respondent no. 2 has been accepted by learned A.G.A, who prays for and is allowed four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Issue notice to respondent no. 1, who may also file counter affidavit within same period, rejoinder affidavit may be filed within two weeks thereafter....

Judges: Bala Krishna Narayana

18 February, 2011·Notice on behalf of the respondent no. 1 has been accepted by learned A.G.A, who prays for and is allowed four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Issue notice to respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4, who may also file counter affidavit within same period, rejoinder affidavit may be filed within two weeks t...

Judges: Pankaj Mithal

18 February, 2011·A plain reading of Chapter XXII Rule 5 of the High Court Rules makes it abundantly clear that the same is applicable in connection with filing of writ petitions under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India except for writs in nature of Habeas Corpus. The provisions of Chapter XXII of the High ...

Judges: Anil Kumar

18 February, 2011·Learned counsel for the respondents also submits that in P.A. case no. 10 of 2008 only hearing is to be done further as per order dated 6.4.2010 passed in Writ Petition no. 50 (R/C) of 2009, M/s West Watch Company Vs. Judge Small Causes/ Prescribed Authority,Lucknow and another has to be decided exp...

Judges: V K Shukla

18 February, 2011·Six weeks and more time is allowed to learned standing counsel for filing counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within next two weeks. List after eight weeks. Order Date :- 18.2.2011 SRY...

Judges: D S R Varma, Abhinava Upadhya

18 February, 2011·Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. On account of illness of Sri Prakash Padia, list the matter in the next cause list. Order Date :- 18.2.2011 skv...

Judges: Amreshwar Pratap Sahi

18 February, 2011·Having heard learned counsel for the parties, it was inappropriate on the part of the petitioner to have not brought on record the final order passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 4494 of 2008 which is to the following effect: "Hon'ble Vineet Saran,J. Heard Sri Praval Tripathi, learned counsel ...

Judges: Ferdino Inacio Rebello, Chief Justice

18 February, 2011·The proceedings are not ex parte. This application at the highest would be in the nature of a review application considering the reasons disclosed in the application by the petitioner herein. It is now settled law as declared in SBP & Co. Vs. Patel Engineering Ltd. And Another, reported in (2005) 8 ...

Judges: Vinod Prasad

18 February, 2011·Summon the trial court record. The appellant has been convicted in S.T. No.78 of 1997 for offences under sections 354, 323, 504, 506(II) I.P.C. 3 (1) (11) SC/ST Act, P.S. Salempur, District Deoria and the maximum sentence awarded to him is 2 years RI with fine of Rs.6,000/-. The rest of the sentence...