Mr Purvish J Malkan For ... vs Mr Rt Songara For
Judges:
01 May, 2012·Heard learned counsel Mr.Raju and learned counsel Mr.M. S. Bhatt. Due to paucity of time, the matter is adjourned to 3rd May 2012 at 2.30 p.m. [ K. S. JHAVERI, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sunitaben vs This
Judges:
01 May, 2012·This is an application for review of judgment and order passed by this Court dated 27th February, 2012 in SCA No. 1456 of 2003 at the instance of original respondent No.1. Learned Advocate Mr. V.M. Dhotre contended that there is an error apparent on the face of the order, inasmuch as this Court coul...
High Court Of Gujarat
The vs Arfees
Judges:
01 May, 2012·1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner for an appropriate order of winding up of the respondent-Company-Arfees Industries Limited under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').2. It is the case of the petitioner that an amount of Rs.14,02,24...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Anand Advocates For Petitioner
Judges:
01 May, 2012·Learned counsel, Mr.Nilesh Pandya, appearing for the petitioner submitted that in view of dismissal of Special Civil Application No.5608 of 1997, which was connected and tagged with present petition, present petition could not be pressed for any relief at this stage. Therefore, the petition is dismi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ziluji vs State
Judges:
01 May, 2012·Heard Mr. Mehta, learned advocate for the petitioner, and Mr. Ashar, learned AGP, for the respondent - State.2. Further affidavit-in-reply dated 25.4.2012 to petitioner's rejoinder has been tendered on record today.3. Mr.Mehta, learned advocate for the petitioner, has relied on documents at page-38,...
High Court Of Gujarat
Indubhai vs State
Judges:
01 May, 2012·This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred with the following prayers:-a) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to admit this petition;b) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or certiorari or in the nature of mandamus or certiorari or any other app...
High Court Of Gujarat
Barariya vs Special
Judges:
01 May, 2012·The endorsement on the Board indicates that Notices issued to respondents Nos.2 to 4, have been served by Direct Service. However, none appears on their behalf, today. As it is first returnable date, list on 03.07.2012.The ad-interim relief granted earlier, shall continue till then.(Smt.Abhilasha Ku...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether vs Present
Judges:
01 May, 2012·1.0. Present Civil Revision Application under Section 29 (2) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (herein after referred to as the "Bombay Rent Act") has been preferred by the applicants herein heirs and legal representatives of original plaintiff-landlord challenging...
High Court Of Gujarat
Maulik vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
01 May, 2012·Mr.Mehta, learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he does not press this application at this stage with a view to taking out appropriate Misc. Civil Application seeking restoration of Civil Application No.14494 of 2006.The application stands disposed of as not pressed. Rule is discharg...
High Court Of Gujarat
Heirs vs Manuben
Judges:
01 May, 2012·Heard Mr.SM Shah, learned advocate for the appellants and perused the impugned order passed by the trial Court. Notice of Appeal from Order and of civil application for stay, returnable on 10.5.2012. D.s permitted.(J.C.UPADHYAYA, J.) (binoy) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.