Sardar vs Om
Judges: S R Brahmbhatt
02 May, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the petitioner.Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the order impugned is based upon the observation of the Apex Court in case of V.A. Tech. Escher Wyas Flowval Ltd. Vs. M.P.S.E.Board and Anr. reported in 2010 Arb. W.L.J.116 for non-suiting the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Minaz vs State
Judges:
02 May, 2012·Pursuant to the notice issued by this Court to resolve the dispute amicably with regard to custody of minor child-Moin, respondent No.2 - father of the petitioner has filed affidavit in reply dated 02.05.2012.The prayer of the petitioner, at this stage, to visit and stay with the minor child-Moin is...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chandrasinh vs State
Judges:
02 May, 2012·1. Heard learned advocate Mr.Dipen Desai appearing for the petitioner and learned AGP Mr. H. K. Patel for respondents-state authorities.2. Learned AGP has placed on record communication dated 01/05/2012 signed by the Joint Registrar (Inspection) which is addressed to learned AGP. Said communication ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujchem vs Unknown
Judges:
02 May, 2012·As the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner has expired, Registry is directed to issue notice upon the petitioner making it returnable on 20/6/2012, informing the petitioner that his advocate has expired and therefore, he is required to make alternative arrangement and engage anoth...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Devusinh
Judges:
02 May, 2012·When the matter was called out, none is present for the respondents.Heard learned advocate for the applicant. The application is allowed in terms of para 7(B) in view of the facts narrated in the application and fact that they have not been controverted in any manner. No costs.(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) p...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jyotikaben vs Sukhsinh
Judges:
02 May, 2012·Prima facie, it appears income-tax return was not filed by the deceased.Learned counsel for the respondent-insurance company has relied upon the decision of the Apex Court reported in 2010 ACJ 1968 and submitted that no interference is called for.However, at the request of the learned counsel for th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shantaben vs Baroda
Judges:
02 May, 2012·The matter has been called out thrice. None appears for the petitioner.The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Notice is discharged. The ad-interim relief, granted earlier, shall stand vacated.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari,J) arg Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sahatradhara vs Varshaben
Judges:
02 May, 2012·SAHATRADHARA CO.OP.HOUSING SOCIETY LTD - Appellant(s) Versus VARSHABEN SADHURAM BULAKHIDAS & 9 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance :MR JAYESH A KOTECHA for Appellant(s) : 1, MR KAMLESH S KOTAI for Respondent(s) : 1 -5. NOTICE UNSERVED for Respondent(s...
High Court Of Gujarat
Digvijaysinh vs Appearance
Judges:
02 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) On 18.04.2012, we had passed the following order:"1. Leave to amend the cause-title."2. The applicant-original petitioner complains of non-compliance of the order dated 28.09.2011 passed by the learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application No.37 of 2011...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Khalilbhai
Judges:
02 May, 2012·1. By way of this appeal, the appellant Insurance Company has challenged the judgement and award dated 27.12.2007, passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court No.4, Ahmedabad(Rural) at Ahmedabad, in M.A.C.P. No.143 of 2001, whereby the tribunal has awarded compensation in the sum of Rs.4,91,46...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.