Commissioner Of Income Tax Valsad & 1
Judges: J B
12 March, 2012·IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 18243 of 2011 To SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 18251 of 2011 For Approval and Signature:HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA ========================================...
High Court Of Gujarat
Commissioner Of Income Tax Valsad & 1
Judges: J B
12 March, 2012·IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 18243 of 2011 To SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 18251 of 2011 For Approval and Signature:HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA ========================================...
High Court Of Gujarat
Commissioner Of Income Tax Valsad & 1
Judges: J B
12 March, 2012·IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 18243 of 2011 To SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 18251 of 2011 For Approval and Signature:HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA ========================================...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kusumben vs Sardar
Judges:
12 March, 2012·Mr.S.N. Thakkar, learned Counsel for the respondent Bank tenders Affidavit-in-Reply. The same is taken on record. S.O. to 9.3.2012.Sd/-(R.M.Chhaya, J.) M.M.BHATT Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Amad vs State
Judges:
12 March, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the petitioner and learned AGP for the State. The petitioner, by way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has approached this Court with following prayers:(A) to hold that circular dated 28.06.2011 annexed to the present petition at Annexure-A i...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manojbhai vs Collector
Judges:
12 March, 2012·1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred, with the following prayers :"(A) Your Lordship be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the inaction on the part of present respondent no.1 t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhaikubhai vs State
Judges:
12 March, 2012·Rule.Learned APP Ms.C.M.Shah waives service of notice of rule.Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submitted that charge sheet is filed. It is further submitted that considering the nature of allegations and role attributed to the applicants, by imposing suitable conditions, the applicants m...
High Court Of Gujarat
M/S vs Geetaben
Judges:
12 March, 2012·1.0 This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 09.08.2009 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Kheda at Nadiad below Exh.6 in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.53 of 2007 whereby the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.25000/- along with interest at the rate of of 9...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Legal
Judges:
12 March, 2012·Heard learned counsel for the applicant.1. Interim relief in terms of Para-6(i) of the application on condition that the applicant deposits the entire awarded amount, including interests and costs, with the Tribunal concerned, within a period of four weeks from today.2. On such deposit being made, t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ganpatsinh vs Chaudhari
Judges:
12 March, 2012·1.0 This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 05.01.1994 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special), Nadiad in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 575 of 1992 whereby the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.1,23,400/- ( Rs. 30,000/- for pain, shock and suffering + Rs. 86400...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.